← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 105 (not an original page number)
Unit 105 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
diansk. For a time this led to the development of an intimate
relationship between the two churches. Many Mennonites had already
gone to hear Wuest 's inaugural sermon. The religious life described
above— mission conferences and festivals, singspirations, temperance
movements, etc.— received a new impetus through him. This continued
until 1848. At that point lamentable rumors began to circulate regarding
Lange’s personal life, rumors which, although monstrously exaggerated
by his enemies, proved to be basically true (according to the Gnadenfeld
“chronicle”). This proved to be a sad chapter in the history of the
congregation. In October of 1849 Lange stepped down from office, moved
away, and returned to the Lutheran Church. According to reports, he
was very successfully active as teacher and substitute pastor in the
Swedish Lutheran colony of Schlangendorf near the Dnieper River. No
other incident has had a more damaging impact upon the development of
Christianity in the Molotschna area than Lange’s moral-spiritual
misfortune. To this day it saddens our heart. The Saviour’s serious
words: "What I say to you, I say to all: be vigilant!” and: “God . . .
gives grace to the humble,” stand as a warning sign at this spiritual
grave, especially to the more gifted and those entrusted with greater
responsibilities. A wise and mighty man of Israel had fallen, mortally
wounding a whole system, a whole intellectual and spiritual way of life,
for a long time. Let that be enough on this matter. Let others pharisaically
sound the bells of self-righteous indignation over the moral failures of
those of different persuasions. (Cf. further XXV, the letter of March 16,
1863.)
16. Bernhard Fast (later, in his last years, the very friendly protector
of the M.B. Church), at the head of the other elders, intervened ruthlessly
in the internal affairs of the almost lifeless, independent congregation,
pouring wine but no oil into her wounds. All her ministers (Wilhelm and
Unrest and Reform
103
Benjamin Lange, relatives of the Elder Wilhelm and F. W. Lange, among
others) were declared to be “deposed” because they had “defended
Lange” (before they had been forced to believe in his guilt!) and thus
“they shared in his sins!” And the perplexed congregation tolerated this
un-Mennonite and unevangelical intervention in her internal affairs: a
sign of inner spiritual weakness on her part one would not have expected.
From the point of view of Bernhard Fast and those who sided with him,
this action was an indication that no clarity had as yet been reached
regarding the separation of civil and ecclesiastical matters, regarding the
community of interests in the major issues of Mennonite life, and the
individual congregation’s inviolable rights of self-determination in all
matters spiritual over against all those caught in the new situation where
civil authorities and the Mennonite Church formed two overlapping
entities. While in thei
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…