← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 112 (not an original page number)
Unit 112 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
company of
ministers came to stand alone over against the combined ministers of all
the other congregations, an especially important circumstance in the
creation of the new M.B. Church (cf. XI-XVIII). However much each
side may have erred, around 1860 Ohrloff was still regarded by the more
progressive— the “brethren,” “the Friends of Jerusalem,” and the
“landless”— as the wise and upright church, the more so since it
contained more spiritually alive and gifted ministers, as well as
members, than the Mennonite Church at large; and the place vacated by
those who went to Lichtenau because of the strife was quickly filled by
those from other congregations, especially by such who had become
disillusioned in the M.B. Church and the Templers during the first two
turbulent years of their existence, as well as by families from the
dissolving Kleine Gemeinde, so that by 1863 Ohrloff was able to
establish a new congregation, Neukirch.
X.
DOCUMENTARY SUPPLEMENT TO THE HISTORY OF THE
SETTLEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE MENNONITE
BROTHERHOOD IN SOUTH RUSSIA TO 1860
In the following we submit a series of contemporary documents, or
excerpts from them, for the purpose of verification, expansion and
illustration of the foregoing brief account.
1. “Brief [ manuscript ] History of our Mennonite Brethren, ”
by Heinrich Heese, Sr.
(Supplement to #32).
Heinrich Heese, who had been active (first as secretary of the §53
Chortitza governmental district and part-time teacher, then for c. 15
years as teacher in the Ohrloff Association School as the successor of
110
IN RUSSIA 1789-1860
Tobias Voth, and finally as founder of and teacher in the Chortitza
Secondary School and, in his ripe old age, as a private school teacher in
Einlage) in the Chortitza and Molotschna colonies since 1818, had been
bom a Lutheran, but early in his youth had become a Mennonite and
married a Mennonite girl. His history of the earlier period was
drawn exclusively from the information imparted to him by the “old
folks’’ and is interesting because it is a kind of self-examination by these
people of their role as contemporaries or transmitters of the opinions and
recollections of their forefathers. His information regarding the later
period is drawn from his own involvement and experiences. He ended his
short account in the '60s, well advanced in years. Being a traditional
churchman, he was an impassioned, indeed bitter opponent of the
emerging M.B. Church, 35 and consequently biased in his opinions.
Heese’s use of the expression “Mennonite brethren” refers to the
Mennonites in general. We will delete such items as have already been
mentioned in connection with him. Heese begins:
a) In Times Past
“Not even our enemies could deny that our original Mennonite
community was characterized by a quiet life, a sincere brotherly love and
a simple faith in the Holy Gospel. [The emigration from the Netherlands
to North Germany and Prussia, the accom
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…