← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 117 (not an original page number)
Unit 117 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
e excerpts and summarizations.
b) “I must, however, in the course of this account, touch on
incidents which fill the human soul with horror and at times make the
very name of Mennonite, which I had held in high regard since my
youth, repulsive. . . . Had God not planted the seed of Christianity in my
heart, which forms the basis upon which I discern the will of God and
which convinced me that we should move to Russia, even I might
perhaps have become disgruntled. Since this is not the case, however, I
forgive the mistakes of those who went astray and pray God that He
may not hold their sins against them. With this conviction I bow myself
to the very dust at the feet of my Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, and
humbly implore the triune God that He may continue to rule in mercy
over me, my family and the colony, in whose midst we live, as well as
over the entire human race. May God bless our imperial family under
whose protection we enjoy so many benefits. . . .
c) "After all the people, even the delegates and their families, had
arrived in Chortitza (1789), the anger of the people against the latter
began to surface more and more. I still remember that shortly after we
had arrived several men approached our wagon and asked whether this
was the place where we were to settle. Hoeppner answered that it was,
Documentary Supplement
115
whereupon he proceeded to explain to them that the earlier plan of
settlement had been exchanged for this one by the Baron [Potemkin, the
governor of New Russia] because the former one, the “Nischekrymisch
plan,” which would have located the colony near Berislav, was too close
to the border of the restless Tatars. Nor had the war with the Turks
come to an end. But they hardly allowed him to speak, far less to
convince them. No one had as yet given this plan serious consideration.
Nevertheless, they descended with such fury upon Hoeppner as c ann ot
adequately be described with words. I thought: Are these also
Mennonites? Nominally, yes! This rebellious spirit grew like a snowball
until it reached immense proportions. And yet, some rational people were
among them, and these investigated the land to its borders and came
back satisfied. Among them was a certain Anton Klassen, who calmed
the storm somwhat with his remark that he wished to see no better land
since this was comparable to land in Germany which sold for 400
guilders per acre. Such land should certainly provide one with a decent
living if God would add His blessing and send good times. With such
words he tried to calm the dissatisfied elements.
d) ‘‘Preparations to build were made. . . . But the angry settlers
would not think of building; for they believed, and expressed it in so
many words, that if no one would submit to these conditions they would
be given better land. [Because of the elevation they considered the land
to be too dry. Compare further the judgment of Senator Contenius]. . . .
When the vice-gover
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…