← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 135 (not an original page number)
Unit 135 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
yrs, in which they expressed their views
concerning that which was to be established among us. ... As I was
delivering this sermon to the brethren, H. W. grasped his cap and said:
‘That is wrong,’ and walked out. Nearly everyone followed him. That
seemed to be the end of everything, for I could not acknowledge their
self-proclaimed holiness, and without such a concession they were
prepared to reject me. [He is again recognized as elder; but how the
matter ran its course can not be clearly understood. . . .] Then I spoke
once again emphasizing the new, and God worked mighty wonders in our
midst, convicting the hearts of the foolish so that they were compelled to
confess their great shame, indeed more than that, as Paul says, such as
is not found even among the pagans; and that not only one, as in
Joshua’s time, but more than two or three among the few of us. And God
gave strength to discipline in accordance with His Word. Nevertheless,
Documentary Supplement
133
one cannot eradicate the spirit of Achan entirely because he remains
hidden until God reveals him. . . .
h) “I must go back once more; for when we had become a separate
congregation it was our desire willingly to serve God in all simplicity and
keep all His commandments as Jesus had instructed His disciples in
Matt. 28. As a consequence, Jesus’ command to wash one another’s feet,
which He both taught and practiced as an act of love, thus became very
important to us, especially since he had very urgently commended it to
us four times. The Frisians and Flemish had rejected it for many years
[though not all: the old Flemish, Alexanderwohl and Gnadenfeld,
practiced it continuously]. And since we became more and more
convinced that we should adopt the practice— this was approximately
in 1826— the words of the author in the Martyr's Mirror were fulfilled
where he spoke: Where God erects a temple, Satan seeks to destroy
it. But God purified us, . . . and so we adopted the loving practice and
intend, God willing, to retain it. . . .” [It appears to be Reimer’s opinion
that the renewal of the practice of footwashing among other things
produced spiritual pride which in turn led to the confusion described
above. We are not in possession of the conclusion of the document.]
i) Aside from a few handwritten documents from inside the Kleine
Gemeinde, which add nothing new to the characterization of this church,
we possess a small printed booklet of some forty pages entitled: Eine
Einfache Erklaerung ueber einige Glaubenssaetze der sogenannten
Kleinen Gemeinde (A Simple Explanation of a few Dogmas of the
so-called Kleine Gemeinde). “Written by a well-intentioned, faithful
servant of the Word of the Lord [Abraham Friesen] in 1845, Danzig, and
published by the Gerhard Press.” Abraham Friesen later became elder 56
of this church. The booklet is an energetic defense of the secession and
the church’s unique position. The language is much clearer, indicating a
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…