← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 139 (not an original page number)
Unit 139 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
are publicly
that this will never happen again in order to make peace from our side
possible. This was done publicly in the Ohrloff Church even before we
and the four above-named ministers sent our last letter off to you. Had
these four ministers and their adherents been the kind who could have
been calmed by such promises, they would not again have complained to
you about it. Oh how gladly would ‘Ohm’ Bernhard Fast again and
again declare before the church never again to extend the Lord’s Supper
to any but Mennonites; truth to say, however, a very unique spirit of
unrest has taken root here and would have manifested itself even if the
Lord’s Supper had not been extended to p. Moritz. Before ever we saw p.
Moritz we had sensed this spirit quite distinctly: and although, in our
Documentary Supplement
137
weakness, we immediately did battle with it, it has nevertheless
remained. It is the Lord who must destroy it. Had a spirit of love and
peace been present in the church, these four ministers would gladly have
forgiven ‘Ohm’ Bernhard Fast and his adherents, for he is far from
extending the Lord’s Supper any longer to anyone who does not wear the
outward appearance of a Mennonite. Of this the entire congregation can
be and is assured, if only it does not deliberately suppress this
conviction.
d) “The above-named four ministers and numerous brethren have
written you, with regard to the Bible Society, that we have, against their
will and advice, written to St. Petersburg, persisting in our request for
permission. It is inconceivable to us that they could say such a thing
since the situation is quite different. It stands thus: When the council of
ministers met on this matter and reached the point at which permission
had to be requested, it came to the conclusion that the elders and several
of the brethren should write to St. Petersburg for authorization. Neither
the four ministers nor the brethren raised any objections to this; only
when everything was completed and the statutes had arrived did they
speak out against it. But by then it was obviously too late. And as far as
the titles of president, director, etc., are concerned, let it be said that
these have never been adopted by us, for we call our officers by their
German designations, such as Vorsitzer (chairman), Beisitzer (vice
chairman), Rechnungsfuehrer (treasurer), and Schriftfuehrer (secretary).
The opponents of the Bible Society submit to you that these titles, which
we do not even use, are the cause for their separation. Here they do not
give this as their reason, but argue that the word Verein (society) should
be abolished because it ties us to other religious groups and this will make
us subject to military service. They said the same in ‘Ohm’ Fast’s very
home before the budget advisor and Lord Contenius who, irritated by
such remarks, raised his snuff-box to the sky and said: The two are as
little related as my snuff-box and the moon. Fr
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…