← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 14 (not an original page number)
Unit 14 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Rueckenau congregation, was already buzzing because of the “protracted
delay of the history.” A few people, whom I had initiated into and who
understood the matter, represented me at the conference, and the latter
accepted the collection of sifted, ordered, and elucidated material
presented, through a recorded vote, as an adequate return for the money
it had paid out. It declared that from now on author and conference were
to stand on a free relationship to one another as far as work accom-
plished and remuneration extended were concerned. (The honorable
conference has made a few small payments for various materials I have
given them toward a “history of the M.B. Church,” for which I express
my thanks). Then, in 1900, it was decided to publish a very short
“history” as a supplement to the “Confession of Faith,” etc. (cf. p. 670);
but due to a misunderstanding between the author and the conference—
the consequence of delays in the mails— this was never brought to
fruition. In 1902, for reasons mentioned on page 164, a somewhat larger
piece was finally to be printed. But this too did not materialize, to the
great joy of the author. God would not allow a “little hat to be built on
chicken feet” (a Russian proverb).
And why, aside from the external hindrances, did the project take so
long? For even I agreed more or less with the optimistic evaluation
concerning my ability to write this “history” expressed by the old Area
Administrative Officer and more or less shared by Wieler and all other
interested parties! Had I not successfully completed a (even though not
academic) specialized examination in order to teach the Russian
language (and literature = history), general and Russian history and
geography! Had I not taught these subjects for thirteen years and read
quite widely in history and church history! At the same time I knew so
many “old folks” personally from the Mennonite Church as well as from
amongst the “brethren.” I remembered a great many incidents from the
“olden days” I had myself experienced (although not as a boy or youth).
Yes, but now the Low German Mennonite proverb— “The untried person
speaks without thinking”— was to come true! I visited many "old folks,”
loving uncles and brothers. They contradicted one another: one said this,
XXIX
another that. They contradicted themselves: they narrated things
differently than they were given in the minutes of meetings they had
themselves signed, differently than their own letters and “reports”
(given to me by themselves or through the Rueckenau church council).
In a period of ten-to-twenty-five years (indeed, in one-to-five years!)
traditions regarding these events had developed in rural areas which
interpreted the events the way they wished them to have happened! And
they were quite honest in all this. Nor was there any difference between
those belonging to the Mennonite Church or the “brethren” in this
regard. Under these circumstances it was
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…