← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 158 (not an original page number)
Unit 158 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
roughout the whole)— a small number of the truly “quiet in the land”
still existed, as is true of all more or less dead church bodies. Here they,
acting like salt, prevent complete decay from setting in; they want to
have nothing to do with labels and partisan strife but alone seek life and
love in God.
b) “To my friend Hoffmann in Marienwerder [in Prussia]. Pastva,
August 21, 1826, according to the old calendar, Molotschna, Russia. My
dear Brother Hoffmann, who has also been redeemed by the precious blood
of the Lord, I wish you and your entire family peace, salvation and
blessing in body and soul. . . . My heart is so filled with love toward you
that, although I am far removed from you, hardly a day passes where I do
not think of you and the many brotherly kisses we gave each other in love.
Documentary Supplement
157
Even though far removed from one another, the disciples of Christ love
one another because each loves the image of Christ and because loving is,
in any case, the nature of believers. The mark of a Christian brotherhood
is that it is disinterested and selfless, for it does not seek its own gain. It
loves, not in order to gain something thereby, but because of Him who
loves His own with an everlasting love and has drawn us to Himself out
of pure love. Christ speaks to His disciples: By this all men will know
that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. The true
mark of discipleship is a true and sincere love toward all who love the
Lord Jesus unreservedly; for just as no one can be numbered among this
group who has not been born again— bom of the incorruptible seed, that
is, the living, eternal Word of God— similarly no man in his natural state
can possess such love, no matter how whitewashed or painted his
outward appearance may be. The outward appearance does not impart
God’s Spirit, nor can it stop or suppress it. This Spirit is free and
unconstrained: therefore He blows where He will, and all those souls who
have felt His influence in their lives, have waited upon Him, prepared a
place for Him to indwell them, and have been called to the true freedom
of the children of God are no longer bound to any form! To such as have
been made free the Lord says: One is your master: Christ; but you are
brethren! They are brothers because one Spirit of sonship in them calls
Abba, dear Father! and because they share a common inheritance in
heaven in which all, through grace, have an equal part. Nor will these
souls tolerate any other head over them, any other name, or acquire any
other thing under heaven except Jesus Christ alone! To be named after
Him— to be members of His body— that is their true glory and their one
happiness. In contrast, those who stress the outward forms carry all the
possible marks of a carnal mind on themselves, which then also produces
ill-will, envy, quarreling and discord! They live carnally. Nor will the
name make any difference: the one may be called
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…