← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 172 (not an original page number)
Unit 172 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ng District of Prischib
together with a few other persons on the right side. The imperial train
consisted of nineteen carriages. The emperor sat in the sixth, an open
coach drawn by six horses. Slowly the procession made its way through
the village. Graciously, the emperor greeted the people to the right and
left; the crowd in turn bowed respectfully. “My wife and I,” writes the
Rev. Hiebert, “stood before the door of our house in order to welcome
our noble guest. He gave the order to stop opposite our house, stepped
out and with quick steps approached our door. When he stood before us
my wife said: ‘If I have found grace in the eyes of Your Imperial
Majesty, I would like to offer him a small gift.' And she handed him a
beautiful bouquet of flowers on a platter. His Majesty willingly accepted
it. When we urged him to enter the house, he said: ‘My host and hostess
must enter with me.’ A large table, decorated with two lamps and many
flowers, was spread out at the top of our large room. 84 In the lower
comer near a cupboard stood a table decked with bread, butter, onions
and pork. The emperor walked up and down the room with rapid strides
several times. ‘O,’ he said, ‘there is something to eat here.’ ‘Yes,’ said my
wife, ‘if I may serve Your Imperial Majesty with this simple fare, I
invite you to eat.’ Thereupon the emperor answered: ‘Yes, dear
children, I want to eat here.’ Hurriedly we adjusted the table and placed
the chairs around it. The emperor would not take the seat of honor at the
head of the table, however, preferring to take an ordinary chair and
seating himself on the side of the table. Thereupon I requested that he
seat himself on the better chair. But he answered: ‘No, my hostess shall
have the place of honor.’ These words perplexed us, and my wife said: ‘I
am far too humble a maid to sit next to the Lord's anointed!’ ‘No, dear
child,’ said the emperor taking her by the hand and leading her to the
place of honor: ‘Just be seated next to me for we are all mere humans,
created equal by God.’ I had to be seated across the table from the
emperor. The words of Psalm 144:3 came to my mind: Oh God, what is
Documentary Supplement
175
man. . . . Thereupon the two generals Gortschakov as well as the aged
Contenius were urged to come to the table. His Majesty ate with
apparent appetite, drank beer and coffee, and, while eating enquired as
to our circumstances in the most affable manner: how long we had been
in his empire, how we liked it and whether or not we had any complaints
about anyone. To this we answered: ‘No, but we would like to thank
Your Imperial Majesty for his great mercy and gracious reception. We
would also like to request grace and Your Majesty's protection for the
future; not only for ourselves but also for our brothers-in-the-faith in
Prussia, who because of the great and difficult war, have come into dire
straits, so that they too might find acceptance and support here.
Thereu
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…