Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 172 (not an original page number)

Unit 172 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
ng District of Prischib together with a few other persons on the right side. The imperial train consisted of nineteen carriages. The emperor sat in the sixth, an open coach drawn by six horses. Slowly the procession made its way through the village. Graciously, the emperor greeted the people to the right and left; the crowd in turn bowed respectfully. “My wife and I,” writes the Rev. Hiebert, “stood before the door of our house in order to welcome our noble guest. He gave the order to stop opposite our house, stepped out and with quick steps approached our door. When he stood before us my wife said: ‘If I have found grace in the eyes of Your Imperial Majesty, I would like to offer him a small gift.' And she handed him a beautiful bouquet of flowers on a platter. His Majesty willingly accepted it. When we urged him to enter the house, he said: ‘My host and hostess must enter with me.’ A large table, decorated with two lamps and many flowers, was spread out at the top of our large room. 84 In the lower comer near a cupboard stood a table decked with bread, butter, onions and pork. The emperor walked up and down the room with rapid strides several times. ‘O,’ he said, ‘there is something to eat here.’ ‘Yes,’ said my wife, ‘if I may serve Your Imperial Majesty with this simple fare, I invite you to eat.’ Thereupon the emperor answered: ‘Yes, dear children, I want to eat here.’ Hurriedly we adjusted the table and placed the chairs around it. The emperor would not take the seat of honor at the head of the table, however, preferring to take an ordinary chair and seating himself on the side of the table. Thereupon I requested that he seat himself on the better chair. But he answered: ‘No, my hostess shall have the place of honor.’ These words perplexed us, and my wife said: ‘I am far too humble a maid to sit next to the Lord's anointed!’ ‘No, dear child,’ said the emperor taking her by the hand and leading her to the place of honor: ‘Just be seated next to me for we are all mere humans, created equal by God.’ I had to be seated across the table from the emperor. The words of Psalm 144:3 came to my mind: Oh God, what is Documentary Supplement 175 man. . . . Thereupon the two generals Gortschakov as well as the aged Contenius were urged to come to the table. His Majesty ate with apparent appetite, drank beer and coffee, and, while eating enquired as to our circumstances in the most affable manner: how long we had been in his empire, how we liked it and whether or not we had any complaints about anyone. To this we answered: ‘No, but we would like to thank Your Imperial Majesty for his great mercy and gracious reception. We would also like to request grace and Your Majesty's protection for the future; not only for ourselves but also for our brothers-in-the-faith in Prussia, who because of the great and difficult war, have come into dire straits, so that they too might find acceptance and support here. Thereu

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…