← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 177 (not an original page number)
Unit 177 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
farthest reaches of the heathen world— go forth with God! We owe our
country, the church and the world, a big debt. And if we do not care to
work, to do thorough physical and intellectual work, then, as a society
and in spite of our advantages and relatively large wealth, we will
become obese dunces like the domestic goose who is no longer able to
help itself,— we will perish like some of our congregations we could name
in foreign countries, who have already or are about to perish— and that
as a consequence of our too great affluence and intellectual indolence.
Documentary Supplement
181
But where are we? We have not yet helped grandfather or
great-grandfather harvest his crop! To employ the Russians as hired help
was unknown; this only began toward the end of the thirties. But even
during the forties, fifties and sixties many fanners still cut the grain
themselves with the scythe.
4. Threshing, which now comes to an end with the last cart-load of
grain, cart-loads that begin to creak at the same time that the happy
buzz of the mower begins and is shortly followed by the melancholy and
always nervous and anxiety -causing 92 hum of the threshing machine,—
took its beginning in those days when the last sheaf had been brought in.
In part the grain was threshed with the horses’ hooves, with wagons,
and since the beginning of the forties gradually with the very practical
threshing stone. Until the latter appeared on the scene, the flail was the
most important threshing instrument. Rye and oats (sometimes barley
as well) were threshed only with the flail and during the winter months
in order to keep the straw fairly long: rye straw was used for thatching
roofs while the rest was chopped up for fodder. At times a stack of rye or
oats remained until after seed-time!
5. The growing of flax constituted an important source of income.
Today farmers probably seed a number of dessiatines with flax, not for
the fibers, however, but in order to sell as much flax seed as possible.
Formerly people were not concerned about the seeds; if one harvested
more than was needed for seed the surplus was taken to the local oil
presses, but this was of secondary importance since the first concern was
for the linen fibers. About one-half acre (one-quarter dessiatine) or more
was planted, and when it ripened properly it was pulled out by hand, tied
in sheaves, set in shocks and, after it had dried, was carefully threshed.
The further preparation of the linen was also very tedious, keeping the
younger as well as older daughters, under the supervision of the mother,
busy with spinning the fibers almost the entire winter. (At the most one
will today find an occasional conservative grandmother spinning some
sheepwool for stockings.) The yarn would be woven into linen by weavers,
of which there were plenty in those days, and then it would be bleached
for a long time— this “night bleaching” was always quite an occasion in
the vi
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…