← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 187 (not an original page number)
Unit 187 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
y into the
Molotschna from the left, from which, in a few years, the beautiful
Documentary Supplement
191
“Juschanle farm” emerged. Here he experimented with soil cultivation,
forestry and gardening, cattle, sheep and horse raising. The results of
these experiments later benefitted the whole settlement as well as many
of the neighboring populace.
d) The success of this man’s experimentation soon attracted the
attention of the higher authorities who recognized his excellent
characteristics, his practical turn of mind and his superior insights. From
1817 onwards, as a young man of twenty-eight and the “plenipotentiary
of all Russian Mennonites,” 104 he had the obligation to further the
welfare of his brethren in every way possible. As witnessed by a letter of
1823, he dedicated himself completely to this calling. Among other
things the letter states: “I feel constrained, as much as lies within my
power, to work while there is yet time, for surely the night will come
when no one can work. I depend on no man nor do I pay any attention to
the slander of those who disagree with me, for I place my trust in God,
my Savior. The time is at hand when everyone of us can do much;
however, be not cold, or lukewarm, but in the name of God attack your
work!” It was this disposition that enabled this man not only to become
the indispensable friend and advisor to all the unprejudiced and
enlightened men of good will among his fellow believers, but equally the
helper and benefactor of the Russians, Jews and Tatars, to whom his
activity, upon the commission of the authorities, was gradually
extended. The Nogai called him the “Batschka Ivan” or the “nimitz-
sheik”— the great leader of the Germans— and, after many a contest
with their most courageous, powerful, skilled, creative, and fastest riding
representatives, he was honored and loved by them. Johann Coraies was
one of those rare people who could find the “real person” within the— to
the limited, self-satisfied, and short-sighted average man apparently
ridiculous and repugnant— outer shell of a stranger and knew how to
elicit the best from him and in turn give his best in order to bring out the
best in the stranger.
e) When the Agricultural Society was founded in the Molotschna in
1830 on the initiative of the government, the Minister of Crown Lands
confirmed Johann Comies as its life-long chairman 105 (the current
Colony Administrator was named ‘first colleague’ , and two others named as
members, later the committee was elected. Comies dedicated himself to
this new and expanded sphere of activity with the greatest sacrifice.
Before he instituted something for the general welfare, he usually made
the necessary experiments himself. These often cost him considerable
amounts of money and sometimes naturally proved futile. In spite of
that his motto remained: “No innovator, but no stubborn devotee of the
old either: the middle-way is the golden mean.” Through pati
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…