← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 199 (not an original page number)
Unit 199 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
he
university), he entered upon his ecclesiastical duties— after, to his own
surprise, a very good performance in his theological examinations— with
all sincerity and an exemplary conduct as the assistant vicar at
Neukirchen and Riedenau (1841-44). Not until the third year of his
ministry, however, was he able to renounce his sinful behavior (which
had taken on a more secretive and refined character) and lead a more
dedicated Christian life in faith, word and conduct. As a minister and
congregational leader (Bible study leader) he enjoyed great success, won
many followers, their trust and brotherly love, but he also became the
object of the vicious hatred of his superior pastor and neighboring
colleagues (pastors), eventually being unjustly removed from his curacy
and hatefully persecuted in that he was forbidden to visit the places
where he was loved the most. Even vagrancy fines were imposed upon
him to disgrace him. He claims that about one year after such blessed
spiritual activity, on New Year’s Eve, 1844/45, he experienced the
complete joy of sins forgiven and the assurance that he had become a
child of God. He maintained a warm relationship with "Pietists,” the
Moravian Brethren, and the Methodists. At one point he almost went to
America as a Methodist minister. But through God’s leading and the
mediation of Hoffmann, the founder of the Pietist colony of Koratal in
§74
205
206
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
Wuerttemberg, he received and accepted the call of the above-mentioned
church at Neu-Hoffnung and thus came to Russia at the age of
twenty-eight. (This account is based on Wuest’s "autobiography”
which he read from the pulpit at the time of his installation in
Neu-Hoffnung, in which he, as in his inaugural sermon, in our opinion
too unsparingly and severely, exposed himself before the new congrega-
tion.) Physically Wuest was a tall and stout man, his voice strong and
sonorous; his outward appearance was friendly and attractive. It was
said of him that anyone who associated with him had to love him, or, on
the other hand, because of his decided Christian stance— hate him,
depending upon the inner attitude of the person in question to the
Christian faith. The church was already full to overflowing at the
occasion of his installation sermon, given in Neu-Hoffnung on September
28, 1845; many Mennonites, who had already associated with the
Wuerrtemberg Pietists, were among those in attendance. (Cf. above,
“Gnadenfeld.”)
2. In order to shed some light on Wuest's character and activity, we
present some written evaluations by his contemporaries.
a) The late Brother Jakob Reimer of Felsental, a long-time resident
of Gnadenfeld and member of that congregation, who died as a leader of
the M.B. Church in Wiesenfeld, describes the Brotherhood Movement
during Wuest’s time in his “Report” of 1884, written to commemorate
the twenty-fifth anniversary of the M.B. Church on January 6, 1885:
"...
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…