← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 201 (not an original page number)
Unit 201 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ere richly blessed, strengthened and
refreshed, even rebuked in our spirit, through the Holy Spirit, and we
took courage, determined to live for the Lord and continue to walk in His
ways. He continued in this way for some years, whereupon the enemy
attempted to disrupt the work from within by creating dissensions
among the brethren” . . . [Because of differing religious viewpoints and
because of the “Brotherhood School"— above #H51 and 53].
b) The late Elder Heinrich Huebert of Liebenau, who died in the
Kuban, tells the following story in his “Recollections of the Early Years
of our M.B. Church, 1884,” written for the twenty-fifth anniversary
history: . Thus it happened, through the guidance of Him who
directs the hearts of kings as the water of the brooks, that our
Mennonite people were allowed to settle in this vast Russia in 1804 [the
Molotschna colonies]. Even though considerable progress had been made
in regard to farming, planting and the building of houses, there was
hardly a trace of a fellowship of faith according to the Gospel, as we now
know it, to be found; for a rude and immoral behavior often manifested
itself during festive occasions, at which even the ministers were present,
which was completely at odds with the character of the “quiet in the
land” [as the Mennonites were known]. How far this could have
gone— God alone knows! But His eternal love found a solution. [He
208
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
recounts the developments under Elder Bernhard Fast and Tobias Voth,
Huebert’s teacher in Ohrloff, which have already been described above.
Until 1860, Huebert was a member of the Ohrloff congregation.] In the
1840s Pastor Wuest, a remarkable revivalist who soon drew the wrath of
the ministers and pastors upon himself, made his appearance among the
Wuerttembergers. Mission meetings and mission festivals were held,
attended by visitors from far and near who often experienced a blessed
fellowship. During a trip to Odessa, where he conducted morning and
evening devotions in the German colonies— for he was forbidden to
preach— he had found many attentive listeners. So deeply had the good
news affected them and so moved were they by it that one of them had
stood up and spoken the following words: ‘Dear Savior, You have a big
heart, 1 have a small one; I jump into your heart. Brethren, follow me!’
When he [Wuest] related this incident to us, he declared that this was
how he wished things to be, that the Gospel might move souls to be free
and spontaneous. Yet, no matter how good and beautiful this might
appear, it nevertheless led some in the wrong direction in that they
believed they were acting according to the mind of Christ if they followed
their emotions, expressing them with outward gestures and jumping and
shouting for joy. Among these were men of no mean talents, and thus
many soon began to follow them. Pastor Wuest realized quite clearly
that the Lord, as a result of this attitud
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…