← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 203 (not an original page number)
Unit 203 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
he always knew how to exploit the slightest opportunity to touch
upon the spiritual condition of the individual and to direct him to the one
thing that really mattered. Such times received their special appeal
through a wealth of wonderful songs and melodies which he had at his
disposal. Frivolous people, scoffers at the truth were taken aback and
became serious; rough and insolent sinners became reflective; those, who
were concerned about their soul’s salvation, quickly gathered around him
from far and near; in the entire South; from Odessa to the Caucasus,
from the Crimea to Kharkov, indeed his contacts reached as far as St.
Petersburg; he was assailed from all sides with invitations and requests;
and he utilized every opportunity that presented itself, not because of
ambition, as he was frequently accused, but because he wanted to work
as long as it was day for the kingdom of the Lord, whom he loved
because He had first loved him. Whoever is informed about our
conditions in the South, in the Evangelical Lutheran Church as well as
amongst the Mennonites, will not be surprised at such an influence upon
the hearts of the people. From out of the midst of these people, who are
moreover also divided into various and sundry kinds of churches, voices
are being heard which bemoan the deep-seated moral decay and call
for admonition and renewal. Here in the territory of the [Lutheran]
church, the masses, who had immigrated from various regions and who
had by and large degenerated in body and soul, had first to be educated
to a better order of things; that could not happen all at once; schools
210
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
were established only years later and even then there was a widespread
dearth of good teachers. Large congregations had only one minister
(when eighteen colonies are served by one minister, and a sickly and
decrepit one at that, can one speak of the spiritual care of the
individual?), who, though he were a faithful servant, only too often lacked
the necessary vigor and joy because of his isolated position and the
consequent absence of fellowship with colleagues which could bring
mutual encouragement and stability. The clash of spirits could not be
avoided; unrest began to stir the masses; even the malice from below
began to raise its head. Those, who fundamentally neither desired the
faith nor wished to know it, to whom the Word of the Cross was a
stumbling block, and to whom contrition and repentance— the circum-
cision of the heart— was a yoke of the priests by which they bound
people, rose in revolt; they claimed there was too much praying, and the
call: Work out your salvation with fear and trembling— was regarded to
be fanaticism by these people. ‘The church is in danger’— was the
outcry of the day. They were not referring to the condition of the church
which was adorned as a bride for the lamb and had its lamps prepared
for the time of the midnight call: 'The bridegroom comes’—
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…