← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 206 (not an original page number)
Unit 206 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ch. Vital air and warmth, food and drink were brought into the
impoverished house. Revived and strengthened, we found the coinage to
renew the house according to the old plan, on the old foundation. During a
later period, Baptists, these “Pietists baptized on their faith”, as one
could designate them in an idealistic association with Wuest and Pietism,
provided very useful services in this renewal and new reorganization.
Just as we placed Menno Simon’s “Ausgang aus dem Papsttum”
(Withdrawal from the Catholic Church), the best of his works, at the
beginning of our story of the Mennonites, so we place Wuest’s inaugural
sermon at the beginning of the section on the M.B. Church. Next to
God’s Word and His Spirit, Menno and Wuest have actually made the
M.B. Church what it is and will be in the Church of Christ. If the joyous
doctrine of justification is overly predominant in Wuest’s Christian
teaching, it counterbalances Menno’s very serious, somewhat melancholy
theology, which is, however, based on justifying grace, and in their
amalgamation, the two streams achieve an apostolic balance. Evangelical
Pietism in its wholesome essence has, like renewal, a harmonious effect
on Menno nitism, just as Mennonitism is the critique and complement of
Lutheranism. During their earliest period, both seemed to be mutually
exclusive. In reality, together they form a whole when balanced in an
apostolic arrangement. And as such a unified balance, and therefore
purified whole, they were to lead the largely deteriorated and
impoverished Christianity of the West during the Middle Ages, back to
its source. In the meantime, they long regarded it as their duty to
condemn one another absolutely. This error is to be corrected, 15 by the
Alliance and fellowship movements on a broader scale and the M.B.
Church on a smaller scale, each in its own way and sphere of influence.
The old “Brethren,” who remained true to the M.B. Church, have always
emphasized Wuest’s extremely great importance. Everyone will agree
Pastor Wuest
213
with the above after reading and comparing the two pieces, “With-
drawl” (1/3) and "Inaugural Sermon.” That consistent Mennonite
believers, who heard Wuest's ideas about the separation of believers and
unbelievers, about the chasm which God has fixed, soon thought of the
church of “Brethren who were baptized on their faith,” is self-evident.
Hereafter follows a verbatim rendering:
INAUGURAL SERMON
of
Eduard Hugo Otto Wuest
presently minister in the
Colony Neu-Hoffnung, given on
September 28, 1845
Moscow
Printed by the University Printing Press
1850
“ When I count the days, when I
yet lay in sin, O, how my soul
shudders, because I regret every
day! Do I count the days of grace
since the Lord called me, I hardly
know what to say: Such mercy is
too deep!"
Sermon
1. In the Prophet Isaiah, chapter 40:6 it is written: "A voice says,
cry! And I said, what shall I cry? All flesh is grass, and all
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…