← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 224 (not an original page number)
Unit 224 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
, it is a sign
that they stand in very intimate union with Jesus, their Savior. I Cor.
10:16. Furthermore, it serves as a sign of the covenant and fellowship of
believers (v.17), and not as a sign of the fellowship of believers and
unbelievers with one another, as it is presently practiced. This is likewise
stated in Menno Simons' Foundation of Christian Doctrine, Vol. I, pp.
115-121. Page 121 reads: ‘If someone errs in doctrine and faith, and walks
in the flesh, he can in no case be permitted to fellowship with the
godfearing and repentant. . . .’ In I Cor. 5:11 the Apostle Paul states: If
any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an
idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one we
are not even to eat. How much less partake of holy communion with
him? Unfortunately, there are many covetous, drunkards and blas-
phemers with whom one shares the Lord’s Supper, for not only those are
drunkards who are almost continually under the influence of liquor, but
also those who occasionally gorge themselves with food and drink at
markets and taverns. I Cor. 10:20-21 says ‘that the things which the
Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils.’ Likewise also, those who walk
in the flesh cannot glorify God in the communion, because they do not
know Him, but as usual they serve the devil herewith, for no man can
serve two masters. Matthew 6:24. Now the apostle did not want the
believers to have fellowship with the devil and the idolater who serves the
devil, and thus become one body, I Cor. 10:17. In Revelation 18:4 the
Savior says, ‘Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of
232
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.’ II Corinthians 6 states
that believers shall have no fellowship with unbelievers, but shall come
out from among them, and be separate.
g) “Regarding footwashing, we confess that the Lord Jesus insti-
tuted it, John 13, to be practiced among one another, for the blessing is
in the deed, not in knowledge.
h) “Ministers may be called in two Scriptural ways : Some are chosen
by God alone, without h uman assistance, and sent out by His Spirit, as
were the prophets and apostles, and also the house of Stephen was
self-appointed to the ministry of the saints. I Cor. 26:15. Such are also
mentioned by Paul in I Tim. 3. Others are called through the
instrumentality of true believers, as recorded in Acts 1. Menno
recognized this, as he proves in his Foundation, Vol. I, p. 148.
i) “Regarding the ban, we confess that all carnal and reprobate
sinners must be banned from the fellowship of believers, as Paul states in
II. Thess. 3:14-15. In the event that someone falls into a carnal sin (God
save us from it), and the Spirit of Christ, who alone can work true
repentance, convicts him of his sin, so that he confesses and repents; in
that case, the church has no authority to ban such a repentant sinner, 30
b
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…