← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 226 (not an original page number)
Unit 226 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ers a testimonium pauperitas, a
certificate of impoverishment. It is noteworthy that Lenzmann now fully
consented to all of this! It was now said among the Brethren that the
Minister Heinrich Franz was, from now on, the driving force in Gnadenfeld
as well as the author of most of lenzm ann 'a papers. Reimer describes
Lenzmann ’s personal attitude as a friendly one for quite some time; in
the council of elders, however, he gradually took over the leading role in
this matter. From now on Ohrloff became the protectress of the Brethren
until they had won a total victory.
233
234
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
3. The following document, “Declaration to the honorable Area
Administrative Office,” makes the purpose of the Brethren completely
clear.
"In accordance with the summons of the honorable Area Adminis-
trative Office to make known what our essential purpose is, we declare,
in the name of all our brethren, who signed the document of January 6,
and, amidst prayer, called upon us to represent them, that each one of us
would much sooner have remained in his own congregation; but because
the ministers, as we declared in the document of January 6, do not act in
accordance with the Word of God, we cannot do so for the sake of our
conscience, and wish to form our own church as Mennonites. For the
rest, we commend ourselves into the hands of our dear Savior, who has
loved us and washed away our sins with His blood. Written at
Halbstadt, January 23, 1860. Abraham Cornels sen, Johann Claassen,
Isaak Koop.”
4. On January 27, the Area Administrative Office, on the basis of
the penal law against secret (!) gatherings, forbade all religious
gatherings in the colonies! (Compare below §159: “Petition to His
Majesty.”)
5. We can discern the attitude of the Ohrloff-Halbstadt congre-
gation to the cause of the Brethren from the following documents.
Because of earlier ecclesio-political blunders 32 (§§50, 58, k,l) and their
now aged Bishop Bernhard Fast, they had also been forced to taste
numerous “rods they had themselves planted."
a) "From the diary” [of an Ohrloff minister, given to the current
Elder David Schellenberg of Rueckenau by the late Ohrloff Church
Minister Franz Isaak and copied in his own hand. Compare further with
the letter of July, 1862]. “I pondered the condition of the Mennonite
brethren [he means all Mennonites here]; and behold, it is even worse than
the departed brethren describe it. There is no fear of God, no faithfulness
or honesty in the land, everyone must beware of his fellow man, his own
brother, and those who still repent of anything repent the fact that they
cannot cheat their fellow man any worse than they already do. And those
who boast, boast of their roguery and revelry, as a hero of drunkenness,
as a ruffian and the like. The keepers of Zion see it and remain silent. Or
should they not be able to see? Are all the keepers blind? And are they
what the prophet describes furt
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…