← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 228 (not an original page number)
Unit 228 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
tudy and finally brought him to the knowledge and the blissful
enjoyment of truth, also erred in certain things; but he accepted them
with love and wisdom from above, and he won over many souls.
Together with him, these are now praising the longed-for Lamb in heaven.
O Lord Jesus! Give Yourself, Your angels, and Your elect the joy of
seeing that your lambs, even when they err, are not sacrificed,
persecuted, or become a prey of the wolf, but are sought out, cared for
236
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
and become a possession acquired by Your blood and made free through
Your truth for time and eternity; and that none of us allow ourselves to
be used as hirelings, ravenous wolves in sheep's clothing, or as a hunting
dog by Satan, but that all of us together may be filled with the Spirit of
Your love and united with one another in faith and become Your blessed
possession! Amen.”
b) The Minister Johann Harder of Blumenstein, who had still
been ordained by Bernhard Fast as elder of the Ohrloff-Halbstadt
congregation in 1860, in a very friendly letter of February 11, fully
acknowledged the decay of the Mennonite Church but also gave warning
in an earnest and friendly manner. Writing to Br. Heinrich Huebert, who
had also left the church but had, till then, been a very active member of
the Ohrloff congregation, he heartily requested their cooperation:
”... But that you wish to leave us causes us grief, for the church whose
condition is in fact as you describe it in your letter, needs members who
recognize the decadence, seek to improve matters and pray. . .
§88 6. Momentary Lack of Courage and a Wrong Move on the Part of
the Three Secessionist Delegates.
"We, the undersigned Mennonites of the Elizabethtal Colony—
Abraham Comelssen, Isaak Koop, and Johann Claassen of Liebenau—
this February 10, 1860, give our word 35 [literally, signature] to the
Lord Inspector of the colonies, that we will not secede from the Mennonite
Church [!!], not perform any ecclesiastical ceremony, indeed not take any
religious action which is forbidden by our church elders— without having
first received the express permission of the higher authorities. Joh ann
Claassen, Abraham Comelssen, Isaak Koop.”
§89 7. Further Actions by the Five Church Elders
"To the Molotschna Mennonite Area Administrative Office. From
all the chinch elders of the Molotschna Mennonite District [of ‘all’ the
elders (7), two were not included: the elders from Ohrloff-Halbstadt and
the Kleine Gemeinde],
Explanatory Statement
"In response to the letter of the honorable Area Administrative
Office of the 5th day of this month, regarding the invitation of the Lord
Inspector of the Colonies of the 1st day of this month, No. 293,
requesting an explanation from us in connection with the members who
have seceded from our Mennonite brotherhood, we declare the following
to be true:
1) “The position of these erring members consists essentially in the
follow
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…