← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 257 (not an original page number)
Unit 257 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
and sisters of Berdiansk, travelled to Neu-Hoffnung where we
met people from Rosenfeld and Neuhoffnungstal [all villages in the
late Pastor Wuest’s parish). We had a blessed time together . . .
Joseph Hottmann is once more happy in spirit . . . . W. Bartel.”
b) Jakob Becker’s letters. The following lines which Becker wrote
to Claassen in St. Petersburg show how the exuberant movement began
to degenerate in the summer of 1861 and the attitude which Jakob
Becker, the assistant church leader, adopted toward the movement.
(Becker, at this time, was in the position of leadership, while the real
266
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
elder or first minister, Huebert, adopted an almost passive attitude
toward the movement because, generally speaking, he was not a man of
energetic character and partially because he had become discouraged by
his own and the severe illness of his wife, as well as partially because he
had been intimidated by the “strong” and the “free”.) "Rudnerweide,
June 11, 1861. The peace of God be with you, dear brother! Greetings
with Psalm 86:6. Strength and beauty are among His people. The Lord
has done great things for us, for which we rejoice .... Sunday we were
so lively [in Jakob Reimer’s home in Gnadenfeld] that the brethren
leaped and danced, while we were near the water [where Jakob Reimer,
the owner of the house, was baptized]. 74 Old Brother Strauss and several
others could not endure it and went into the old grandfather’s house ....
On the Tuesday evening before Pentecost, Wilhelm Bartel was with us
[in Rudnerweide], and we sang outside before the door, giving thanks
and shouting for joy with one another. And the world shouted back at us
... It gathered at the street fence and listened . . . . W. Bartel went out
to preach the gospel to them. [Meanwhile, a deputation from the
Mennonite Church is supposed to go to St. Petersburg in order to work
against Claassen there] .... If he [the minister they sent to represent
them] will say that we rejoice with much shouting and that we also
dance, then he will speak the truth . . . but I suppose that you must have
Scriptural grounds to justify the matter .... Jakob Becker.”
c) Jakob Reimer of Gnadenfeld represents the other side. He, too,
writes to Claassen on the same day: “Gnadenfeld, June 11, 1861. Today
three men from the Old Colony— Unger, Epp and Loewen— visited me
for two and one-half hours. [Cf. further Geschichte der Mennoniten
Brueder Gemeinde Chortitzer Bezirks (History of the M.B. Church,
District of Chortitza.)] But they are very narrow-minded and fear that the
same thing will happen to us that happened to them [in the ‘Kronsweide
revival,’ cf. #127], thus they warn us. . . . They have impressed me as
being sincere, and it is such people that God allows to prosper .... (June
18). Brother, I do not wish to accuse anyone, nor am I regarded very
highly any more by those who are too much disposed toward the
unrestrained express
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…