← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 260 (not an original page number)
Unit 260 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
I commend
you to the love and faithfulness of our Savior! Your brother, Heinrich
Huebert.”
g) Johann Claassen of Liebenau writes a letter to the congregation
from St. Petersburg in which we recognize his mediating, but still too
lenient attitude toward the “exuberant” movement: “St. Petersburg,
June 18 (20), 1861. Dear brothers and sisters in Berdiansk and
Molotschna! . . . Finally, finally I have received the much-longed-for
letters. We demand that our civil liberties not be denied us [through the
‘ban’ which hindered their civil activities]; and we have a right to do
this: we are entitled to seek protection as long as our highest secular
authority [the monarch] allows us to do so. [Compare the petition to His
Free and Exuberant Movement
269
Imperial Majesty above.] But if the authorities prove to us that we have
□o separate existence as secular citizens, what am I then to say? What I
mean is this: Brethren, you should ask yourselves in all seriousness: Is it
entirely possible that no imitation should occur in the midst of so much
tumult? If one has the feeling that he could shout for joy with all his
might but refrains from doing so out of consideration for one or another
brother (but not because of human fear), and thus does him a service,
should this always be sin? May the following verse have absolutely no
application here: All things are lawful for us, but not all things are
helpful? May one brother never say to another: Dear brother, if you were
to shout or rejoice ten times harder than you already do— and if your
voice were ten times stronger than it is, God’s mercy would still be much
greater, higher, deeper, longer and wider than you could ever shout it
out. But since Christ, highly praised in all eternity, rather than
shouting for joy, is our element, might we not, for this or that reason,
perhaps acquit ourselves more quietly— should that always be considered
Pharisaism or sin? Of course, I can understand that brothers and sisters
filled with new wine cannot leave off shouting. Nor do I demand this of
them, for I myself have felt and tasted how kind the Lord is when once
in a dream I felt like throwing down my cap, tearing my clothes (which
the Jews did for sadness), indeed even throwing myself down before the
Lord, to be consumed, wishing never to rise again for joy. But even this
would fall short and never express our joy adequately. God’s mercy is
too exalted, too glorious, too precious than that we should be able to
express it with our voice or gestures. And so, since things are the way
they are, judge and be sober, and do not immediately think, if for some
reason you sometimes shout less for joy, that Christ, our bridegroom, is
therefore lowered one rung in heaven! That this my language will not at
all please many of you, dear brethren, and you, indeed many of you, will
say, Claassen has become a Pharisee, will not influence me in the least.
And though you should attack Jakob R
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…