← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 264 (not an original page number)
Unit 264 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
three) with rage and vengeance. Give this letter to your
husband to read (when he returns from St. Petersburg). I beg him not to
treat this matter in a one-sided way; rather, when he has heard the other
brethren, that he then also listen to me .... I believe that once Brother
Claassen will be present, the brotherhood will take on a completely
different turn .... I John 5 and Romans 14:1. [But he utterly forgets
his former ‘gospel lye,’ his ‘saltpeter’ and ‘salt,’ his defence of the
soundness of these “young ones” half a year earlier!] According to I Cor.
13, what does it profit to have tongues of men and angels without
love? . . . Christ alone is my foundation; this my foundation is eternal,
and poor sinners are His heavenly kingdom . . . .” Somewhat later he
writes to Otto Forehhammer in St. Petersburg. We condense this very
long and bitter letter, the expression of a distracted and wounded
personality, as much as possible, without indicating omissions (. . .),
“Since I do not know whether or not the brethren Claassen and Gerhard
Wieler are still there, and because you have been falsely informed about
the condition of our brotherhood, I will share some things with you. You
are familiar with its beginning, and we agree that this was of God. We
Difficulties and Victory
273
lived in glorious peace; God was with us in the power of His Gospel. But
half a year after Claassen’s departure [to St. Petersburg in November,
1860], some of the first members [the five mentioned above] found in the
Bible that brethren and sisters should greet each other with the kiss of
love. Already at that time quarreling and conflict emerged among the
members in the villages [of the Molotschna], Whoever was not joyful in
the faith was not truly ‘free’ it was said; he ‘had not been liberated’;
he lived ‘pharisaically’ and legalistically, was still ‘in the flesh and
carnal,’ etc. That came to my attention and I was asked by Andreas
Voth and Abraham Cornels sen 80 to come and seek to straighten out the
matter. I saw then that the brethren were too ‘spiritual’ and left Christ
out of view. [And in November, 1861, he had declared them to be
‘shipwrecked in the faith.’] But they would not accept admonition. I
begged them with all seriousness to put away this matter. Frequently
the weak [?] were so harassed that I, coming from a distance, couldn’t
understand the situation. All of this happened, in my opinion, in a
spiritual manner [!], naturally in the spirit of self-righteousness. Some
rashly presumed to have weathered all reefs. Instead of singing ‘I know
no weaker servant,’ they sang ‘I know no better servant, I do
everything right for Him,’ and the like. And so, instead of being poor in
oneself and rich in Christ, one began to be rich in oneself and poor in the
knowledge of Christ. [How aptly said!] Those who are jointly responsible
for H’s fall, his former bosom friends, now set upon him and crushed him
in spite of all his plea
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…