← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 268 (not an original page number)
Unit 268 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
d as pleasing to God; the opposite would be regarded as the way
of heathen and publicans, in the words of the Savior.
f) With praise and thanks to God it was attested that the “so-called
doctrine of freedom” had not had any adherents in the church for three
years and that those who had been guilty of adhering to it had repented.
NB. The Chortitza-Einlage congregation proceeded in full harmony
with the Molotschna congregation in this reform. See “Documentary
Supplements,” #194.
§122 9. In September 1865, the essence of these resolutions was
submitted in writing to the representative of the government, Privy
Councillor Brun, as a confession of the church, by Brother Huebert (who
Free and Exuberant Movement
277
was released from prison in November) and two other brethren who had
been called to the ministry, Christian Schmidt (now minister and
associate-elder) in the Kuban 64 and Jakob Jantz (now, in 1910, elder in
Friedensfeld).
10. In the beginning of the winter of 1865 the same two brethren §123
took a tour 85 (see #196) through all the Molotschna villages, and indeed
wherever they found a welcome with ministers and Christian friends
(such as ministers Franz Klassen, Ladekopp; Bernhard Harder,
Halbstadt; Jakob Martens, Tiegenhagen; Elder Harder, Blumstein),
they shared the current attitude of the church and its repentance in
respect to earlier heresies. At the anniversary meeting of the M.B.
Church on January 6, 1885, in Rueckenau, Molotschna, the
above-mentioned material was read to approximately 1,000 persons in the
form of a short, handwritten “History of our M.B. Church" authored by
the late ministering brethren, Johann Wieler 86 and Johann J. Fast,
Rueckenau.
11. The M.B. Church of today, by the grace of God, has no part in §124
these aberrations of its childhood and is free of guilt. The best record in
this case are the men who since 1865 and later have stood and are
standing in various church positions as spiritual shepherds and servants,
like Heinrich Huebert, Christian Schmidt, Jakob Jantz, Abram Unger,
Aron Lepp, Daniel Fast, Johann J. Fast, Abram Schellenberg, and their
co-workers and followers during the past forty-five years. These men are
known in the entire Mennonite community in Russia and America as
naturally incapable of participating in such ridiculous errors. This author
was baptized in the summer of 1866 and became a member of the M.B.
Church in the Molotschna. He cannot recall a single instance that in any
way resembles the above proceedings.
12. These resolutions were also accepted in the Chortitza-Einlage §125
and the Kuban congregations. However, the ideas of the period before
1865 caused sporadic unrest in the Kuban for a while longer because
most of their extreme promoters lived there and many of the latter were
not members of the church. The Einlage congregation had other
difficulties to overcome before it could come to rest. These matters will
be descr
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…