← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 277 (not an original page number)
Unit 277 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
a],
in which the practice of baptism was also described as it is now being
practiced in the M.B. Chxrnch. Similarly, the “church brother” Abram
Matthies of Rudnerweide presented him with a tract published by the
Baptists, with the vexing words: “You will probably be able to use it.”
He accepted it with thanks. From this time on, there was much
discussion about it and there were “difficult scenes” among the brethren,
a number of whom later withdrew as a result of baptism [but only after
1862, when it was gradually made mandatory]. 4) “Since most of them
did approve of building the church according to the Word of God,” one
should also begin to baptize. Only they did not quite know bow to begin,
because none of the brethren had been baptized in this manner, and thus
the matter was delayed. On one occasion, “all those in Waldheim were
together with the full blessing of the Lord,” and there, too, baptism was
again discussed. Several young brethren, on the homeward journey from
this meeting in Waldheim, came to the Kuruschan creek [halfway
between Waldheim and Gnadenfeld, which are about 10 versts apart],
and two said to each other: “Here is water” . . . And so they opened the
Word of God, for almost everyone carried a Testament and
Glaubensstimme hymnal with him, and after reading, singing and
praying, they baptized one another on their faith by immersion, during a
night of bright moonlight [on September 23, I860]. The two were the
brethren named previously: Jakob Becker (elected to the ministry at
the same time as Heinrich Huebert, on May 30, 1860) and Heinrich
288
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
Bartel (ordained along with Abram Peters of Gnadenheim and Franz
Klassen of Elizabethtal as the first deacons by Heinrich Huebert in the
winter of 1860/61).
c) Only in the winter of 1860/1861 did they correspond with the
Baptist minis ter, Alf, in Poland, and simultaneously with the Mennonite
brother, Peter Ewert who also lived there. The latter and another
Mennonite baptized each other in 1861, after receiving an account of the
secession and baptism at the Molotschna, in a letter from the
Molotschna brethren. This letter was read in a large assembly of
Mennonites, Lutherans and Baptists, followed by an election of ministers
and baptism. “They did not want to begin anything before we had
written” (Jakob Becker’s letter to Claassen, December 3, 1861),
although Alf’s church was already in existence nearby, organized on the
basis of the German Hamburg confession. This correspondence shows
that the questions of military service and footwashing prevented
complete unity between the Mennonite Brethren and the Baptists. We
present the following items from that correspondence: 1) Jakob Becker
to Joh ann Claassen in St. Petersburg. Rudnerweide, April 16, 1861.
“. . . We received word (from Poland] . . . that some have been baptized
by the Baptist Minister Alf [even before Ewert] and still remain
Mennonites .... On Ch
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…