← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 279 (not an original page number)
Unit 279 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ge with Br. Johann Loewen. I was there for a day and a night, with
the brethren .... Some brethren wish to join us, so that they will not be
a fellowship unto themselves, but will be in one group with us. Abram
Unger has written to Hamburg for a minister who is to come and baptize
them. It appears that in spring a Baptist minis ter will come. But they
are not all agreed on this .... Benjamin.”
b) Brother Heinrich Epp relates: At the Molotschna, a school
teacher, Gerhard Wieler [in Liebenau] became a believer. Since W.
belonged to the Chortitza District, he was exiled there and sent here. Br.
Abram Unger took him into his home toward the end of 1861. Because
Br. Wieler was talented and educated he urged Br. Unger to cancel the
call to the brethren who were to come from Hamburg, which Unger did
after resisting for some time. Br. Oncken wrote that he had nothing to
lose, but that the brethren would discover that it was not easy to
establish a church.
c) [Epp relates that] several brethren had gone to the Molotschna
[summer, 1861: see Unger’s letter #115, c, above] to attend a baptism
and speak with the brethren. Here one heard quite a bit about how
things were going with the Brethren. Baptism was performed according
to the Word of God, but there was no order [and a “childish” mann er of
expressing their joy was repulsive. Cf. #115]. Yet the baptism was
correct, and Gerhard Wieler, who was with us and had proclaimed
§132
290
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
himself as leader, as well as Benjamin Becker, urged that we unite with
the brethren at the Molotschna. Ten months later [according to Epp and
others], the brethren Abram Unger, Heinrich Neufeld and a third brother
again went to the Molotschna and were baptized there by Gerhard
Wieler. This took place on Sunday, March 4, 1862, in Liebenau in the
Tokmak Creek according to letters from Benjamin Becker, G. Wieler and
Mrs. Claassen (Liebenau), written during those days. On the following
Sundays, March 11 and 18, the first baptisms ensued at Einlage, in the
Dnieper River, with 18 persons, both men and women on the first
occasion, and 17 persons on the second. Thus writes Br. Jakob Janzen
from Sergeievka, whose dates seem to be the most accurate and
correspond with those of the Molotschna letters. Further baptisms
followed in rapid succession.
d) Elder Aron Lepp tells of his baptism: In my opinion, the
movement that occurred at the Molotschna [the “exuberant” movement]
was not in accordance with the Gospel. At that time I advised the
brethren to wait until we could see what the outcome of the matter there
would be. Yet in the spring of 1862 Br. Abram Unger, Heinrich Neufeld
and another brother went there and were baptized. I and my dear wife,
who had also accepted the Savior during that time, traveled to the
colony to be baptized. We were driven out of the baptismal waters with
sticks. But another spot was chosen where the sacred ceremony was then
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…