← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 28 (not an original page number)
Unit 28 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
n performing these our heavy and dangerous duties is apparent
to all well-disposed people, who may readily judge from the works and
their rewards. Herewith I humbly entreat the reader for Jesus’ sake to
accept this my forced confession concerning my illumination, conversion,
and calling and to receive it in a good spirit. I have made it out of great
necessity so that the pious reader may know how it happened, seeing
that I am slandered by the preachers and am accused without foundation
of truth of being called and ordained to this service by a seditious and
heretical sect. He that fears God let him read and judge.”
2. Johannes Deknatel: Report Concerning Menno and the Origin of
the Anabaptist Movement.
Johannes Deknatel, teacher (elder and pastor) of the Amsterdam
Anabaptists, who died in 1759, edited a collection of the most remarkable
of Menno Simons’ works, which were translated from the Dutch into
German in 1765 and printed in Koenigsberg, East Prussia, under the
title Fundamente der Christlichen Lehre (Foundations of Christian
Doctrine), etc., in three volumes. In the introduction Deknatel presents
the following information and opinions concerning Menno Simons and
the origins of the Anabaptists, later called Mennonites. This is also
contained in Reiswitz and Wadzeck, Beitraege. Deknatel was a
pious man, deeply committed to his religious fellowship and its
teachings, and an important academic theologian as well as tolerant and
brotherly toward other believers. It is a pleasure to be able to
substantiate that he was an intimate friend and brother of Count von
Zinzendorf, and that he and many other Mennonites participated in the
founding of the Moravian Brethren (intended originally to be merely an
association, not a separate church). Zinzendorf had communion with
Deknatel and his household in the latter’s home. In like manner, he was
closely associated with John Wesley (according to Kiefemdorf as
reported in Leendertz).
Deknatel wrote both in Dutch and in German. However, we are not
tied to the style of either edition and paraphrase freely.
a) Deknatel writes that, “just as there were many reform move-
ments like the Waldensians, the Wycliffites and the Hussites, which
God used to prepare the way for the great Reformation, Anabaptists
existed before Menno. [Compare below: “Bohemian-Moravian Brethren”
Menno Simons
11
or peaceful Hussites]. Some of the Waldensians too, as Menno reports,
who existed as ‘churches under the cross,’ practiced adult baptism and
refrained from swearing oaths or participating in wars and so forth.
Because of the intense persecutions they were exposed to, however, they
had become dispersed sheep; it was probably they who called Menno,
according to his own testimony in his withdrawal from the Catholic
church, to be their bishop.”
b) Thus I assume, writes Deknatel, after having carefully weighed
all the evidence, that Menno, after having begun his reformation activ
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…