← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 281 (not an original page number)
Unit 281 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
dispassionately and impartially by quoting outside
opinions.
a) Luther and Calvin declare succinctly and categorically that the
idea of “baptizo” (Greek) and "mersio” (Latin) is “to immerse
completely under water,” and the German word "taufen” is according to
Luther identical with “deep”, 92 “immersion”; and the “old church,”
according to Calvin, practiced immersion (see Confession of Faith of . . .
the Mennonite Brethren Church in Russia, 1900-1902). In any lexicon,
encyclopedia, or Bible dictionary one finds the same explanation.
According to the Calwer Kirchenlexicon, II, 804, “Luther at first would
have preferred to re-instate immersion [in child baptism] but it could not
be done anymore, and he did not want to make a doctrinal issue of it.”
b) We cite some further quotations from the strictly denominational
Lutheran Kirchliches Handlexikon by Dr. C. Meusel, Leipzig, Justus
Naumann, Volume I, page 283: “Baptisterium, baptistry building. In the
primitive church up to the beginning of the third century, baptism as a
292
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
rule was carried out in the open at locations safe from disturbances or
onlookers, either in rivers by total immersion, or at springs, whereby the
candidate stood in the water at the depth of the spring and the baptizer
poured water over him. Gradually it became customary to use the
thermal springs, in the homes of believers, for baptism. These cisterns
were called “baptisterien” by the Greeks, and “piscinae” by the Romans
[from piscis, fish], because they permitted swimming. From these
antique bathing establishments the early church baptistries received
their form, after the fourth century. [A baptistry such as this has been
unearthed at the Kherson Monastery near Sevastopol and provided with
an explanatory inscription. The basin is quite deep enough for
immersion.] After the sixth and seventh centuries the baptistry was
transferred to a side-chapel of the church itself. When later, however,
baptism was commonly practiced merely by sprinkling, it was deemed
sufficient to have only baptismal stones in the church itself .... Of the
old baptistries, particularly noteworthy are those in Parma, Pisa,
Ravenna, and Florence. In the Greek and Russian churches the custom
of immersion has been maintained together with the baptistry . . . .”
Volume VI, p. 577: “The actual form of baptism in oldest times was to
immerse three times, in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Spirit. Temporarily the Spanish church limited itself to one immersion in
order to express its opposition to Arianism. Thus, although immersion
was the rule, pouring and sprinkling must also have been permissible
very early.” Volume IV, p. 96: “The baptism of the infirm, baptismus
clinicorum : in the oldest churches the baptism of sick persons, who
were in danger of death, was carried out not by imm ersion but by
sprinkling and pouring. For this reason disagreement about its validit
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…