← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 286 (not an original page number)
Unit 286 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ut baptism]. In
1648 [eighty-nine years after Menno’s death] seventeen church members
extended the demand that the mode of baptism be immersion, that
footwashing precede the celebration of communion, and that co mm union
be commemorated at night with unleavened bread. Whether they wished
to see this innovation apply to the entire church or just to themselves, is
not clear. According to G. Roosen, Minister Beerens of Luebeck was the
initiator of these innovations and Minister Jem Borchers their chief
promoter. Yet innovations they were, because our congregation stood in
intimate relationship with that of Fresenburg where Menno himself lived
and taught, and thus it had much the same mode of worship as the
former. If Menno himself had baptized by immersion, at least towards
Baptism by Immersion
297
the end of his ministry, the Dompelaars here would certainly have
appealed to his example. How the members of our church first arrived at
the notion of these demands remains uncertain. Bolten suggests a
four-fold possibility in this regard, namely: they could have come from
the Collegiants in Holland; or Abraham de Voss, who lived in Colchester
[England], and was baptized by the Baptists, could have provided the
impetus; or the writings on the history of baptism (1646-1647) by
Mehring from Holstein could have been the cause; or these views could
perhaps have been conveyed from Polish Prussia [thus from the
homeland of our Mennonite fathers]. Soon the controversies took on a
very irritable character in which the members who held on to the old
traditions seem to have acted very harshly. One of the most energetic
and zealous opponents of the innovators was Gerhard Roosen, a deacon
since February, 1649. At one point this dispute reached the stage where
the Danish military had to intervene. [Altona, where the Hamburg-
Altona Church was and still is located, at that time belonged to
Denmark.] In their polemical writings the Dompelaars also accused their
opponents of having forcibly evicted them from the common church
building, toward the purchase of which they had themselves earlier
contributed. Around 1656 the division of the two quarreling parties into
two entirely separate churches is supposed to have taken place [despite
efforts towards reconciliation by the Amsterdam and other Dutch
Mennonite pastors]. That this dispute was a very painful one may be
inferred not only from the bitterness with which it was carried on, but
also from the circumstances that it (the dispute) partially affected
certain families of the church deeply. The well-known Dompelaar
Minister Jakob Denner, 97 originally a dyer in blue, worked very
effectively here and in other places from 1684 [as an 18-year-old
adolescent] until his death at the age of 80, on February 17, 1746 .... In
Barmbeck, not far from Wandsbeck, a pond was rented in which at least
the first members of the church were baptized .... In 1666 the Flemish
Church [the la
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…