Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 286 (not an original page number)

Unit 286 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
ut baptism]. In 1648 [eighty-nine years after Menno’s death] seventeen church members extended the demand that the mode of baptism be immersion, that footwashing precede the celebration of communion, and that co mm union be commemorated at night with unleavened bread. Whether they wished to see this innovation apply to the entire church or just to themselves, is not clear. According to G. Roosen, Minister Beerens of Luebeck was the initiator of these innovations and Minister Jem Borchers their chief promoter. Yet innovations they were, because our congregation stood in intimate relationship with that of Fresenburg where Menno himself lived and taught, and thus it had much the same mode of worship as the former. If Menno himself had baptized by immersion, at least towards Baptism by Immersion 297 the end of his ministry, the Dompelaars here would certainly have appealed to his example. How the members of our church first arrived at the notion of these demands remains uncertain. Bolten suggests a four-fold possibility in this regard, namely: they could have come from the Collegiants in Holland; or Abraham de Voss, who lived in Colchester [England], and was baptized by the Baptists, could have provided the impetus; or the writings on the history of baptism (1646-1647) by Mehring from Holstein could have been the cause; or these views could perhaps have been conveyed from Polish Prussia [thus from the homeland of our Mennonite fathers]. Soon the controversies took on a very irritable character in which the members who held on to the old traditions seem to have acted very harshly. One of the most energetic and zealous opponents of the innovators was Gerhard Roosen, a deacon since February, 1649. At one point this dispute reached the stage where the Danish military had to intervene. [Altona, where the Hamburg- Altona Church was and still is located, at that time belonged to Denmark.] In their polemical writings the Dompelaars also accused their opponents of having forcibly evicted them from the common church building, toward the purchase of which they had themselves earlier contributed. Around 1656 the division of the two quarreling parties into two entirely separate churches is supposed to have taken place [despite efforts towards reconciliation by the Amsterdam and other Dutch Mennonite pastors]. That this dispute was a very painful one may be inferred not only from the bitterness with which it was carried on, but also from the circumstances that it (the dispute) partially affected certain families of the church deeply. The well-known Dompelaar Minister Jakob Denner, 97 originally a dyer in blue, worked very effectively here and in other places from 1684 [as an 18-year-old adolescent] until his death at the age of 80, on February 17, 1746 .... In Barmbeck, not far from Wandsbeck, a pond was rented in which at least the first members of the church were baptized .... In 1666 the Flemish Church [the la

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…