← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 295 (not an original page number)
Unit 295 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
d of this baptism when he
said: ‘One comes after me Who will baptize you with the Holy Ghost
and with fire!’ These baptisms are not two, however, but a double
baptism, and are so closely related to one another that they cannot be
separated from each other; and on Pentecost this prophecy of a baptism
to come was fulfilled, according to Acts 2:1-4.
2. “The Apostle Paul also speaks of this baptism in I Corinthians
12:13, where we read: ‘For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one
body— Jews or Greeks, slaves or free, and all were made to drink of one
Spirit! ' The correct understanding of this baptism is as follows, that the
spirit of man, through sin, died a spiritual death, as it were, and is in
need of a reawakening to spiritual life— which life man had before the
fall. And the means for such a reawakening is described by the word
‘baptism,’ which means ‘incorporation,’ that is, a re-incorporation with
§137(2)
306
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
God, with Whom fellowship was broken through the fall. But Holy
Scripture speaks of three kinds of baptism: water, spirit and blood
baptism. John, too, testifies concerning this three-fold baptism, and how
all three fit together, when he writes: ‘This is He who came with water
and blood (Jesus Christ), not with water alone but with water and blood.
And the Spirit is the witness, because the Spirit is the truth. There are
three witnesses in heaven: the Spirit, the water, and the blood, and these
three agree.’ Therefore, spirit, water, and blood baptisms belong
together if they are to achieve their intended purpose. The latter refers to
Christ’s baptism of suffering and blood, Luke 12:49-50 and Matt. 26:28,
a baptism on which our salvation alone depends. Whoever receives water
baptism without the baptism of the Spirit has as yet no part in Christ’s
blood baptism, which alone saves according to 1 John 1:7, for only the
baptism of the Spirit can produce a ‘walking in the light,’ as He, God,
is in the light, that is, a life of Christian discipleship according to John
8:12. Only then does the blood of Jesus Christ cleanse us from all sin,
Revelation 1:5-6; for through the baptism of the Spirit the spirit of
man, though dead in sin, is awakened, renewed, cleansed and made holy;
even though this Holy Ghost is called ‘water’ in the Old Testament, in
Isaiah 44:3 and Ezekiel 36:25, where the communication of the same is
called ‘pouring’ in the former reference and ‘sprinkling’ in the latter,
both of which have been fulfilled in this form in the New Testament and
are called baptism. Water is the flowing element for the cleansing of all
bodily filth upon the body, but the spiritual pollution of the Spirit in the
heart no natural water can remove; consequently, even water baptism
cannot again restore that fellowship with God which has been broken
through the fall and which must be achieved in this mortal life if we want
to dwell in eternal bliss. For that purpose
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…