← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 300 (not an original page number)
Unit 300 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
mention his name later at the appropriate
place with reference to this question. In a letter dated March 27, 1910,
this brother writes: “. . . the . . . congregation allows even infant
baptism to stand as a form of baptism, not as the normal form of
baptism, it is true, but nevertheless as a form of baptism which the Lord
acknowledges by His Spirit [cf. #136.8 and footnotes for (b)3 of #137.2]
and considers not merely Mennonites and Baptists as baptized
Christians, but Lutherans, Reformed, Catholics and Orthodox as well.
On occasion it will even celebrate communion with Lutherans, as of
course also with Baptists and Mennonite Brethren, if they express a wish
for it. It also allows mixed marriages with those who have been baptized
as infants, as well as with Baptists and Mennonite Brethren. We believe
that the body of Christ is to be found in all churches and communions of
the Lord’s church. We believe in one universal Christian church, one
fellowship of the saints— we are in fact true Alliance people .... We
baptize ... in keeping with our Mennonite confession of faith, only upon
the testimony of repentance for sin and faith in Christ, though we indeed
require only the minimum [lowest level] of that which the Scriptures
Baptism by Immersion
311
expect of candidates for baptism, when the maximum [highest level] is
still lacking. If, aside from those who have already reached the maximum
and who, like Cornelius of Caesarea, had already received the baptism of
the Spirit when he was baptized with water, we also baptize those who
manifest a repentant and believing attitude, that is, who only possess
faith in the form of a longing for salvation and confess the truth of Acts
4:12 and that ‘Jesus, thy blood and righteousness, my beauty are, my
glorious dress,’ when faith is present as a sure and confident hope and
as a truth not to be doubted, according to Hebrews 11:1, and combined
with a proper way of life [compare Hit 137 and 212 above, especially the
end], hoping that they may eventually achieve the maximum, the
assurance of faith and the reception of the baptism of the Spirit— then
that too is a baptism upon the faith in accordance with the Mennonite
confession .... Menno Simons certainly baptized such souls also.
[Compare 5e and if lie.] Neither Menno Simons nor the apostles in their
time withheld baptism from those who had only experienced the
minimum of that which the Scriptures teach a candidate for baptism
should possess. You might say [of the letter writer and his congregation]
that they are simple Mennonites, attempting to follow the Mennonite
confessions of faith [though far from a full understanding of Menno’s
teaching and a strict interpretation of the old confessions, which is also
true of this writer, though not of Elder Isaak Peters]. Against the fullest
experience we are in no way opposed. That is also the reason why we are
happy when these persons remain humble in spirit . . . .”
f)
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…