← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 31 (not an original page number)
Unit 31 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Many of
the congregations in the Palatinate, Switzerland and Alsace are still in
existence today [during Deknatel’s lifetime]; even in Northern Hungary
congregations of those who fled there from Moravia still exist. 27
Occasionally we [of Deknatel’s time] receive letters from the former as well
as the latter. Without a doubt, the latter are of Waldensian 28 origin.
g) From all of this it is apparent that Menno was a faithful
instrument of the Reformation and the most formidable founder [actually
only reorganizer!] of our church, comparable to Luther and Calvin in
their churches. For Menno was not only exceptionally talented, blessed,
zealous and suited to this task; in addition he was not an uneducated
man. He knew Latin and Greek: the former can be seen from the
introduction, marginal notes and conclusion to his essay on Christian
baptism; the latter from his co mm ents upon and evaluation of Greek
words scattered throughout his writings. [Thus far Deknatel. Ramseyer
says that Menno had, through intensive studies, prepared him self very
well for the priesthood. Even his enemies conceded that his writings
proved him to be exceptionally learned for his time. Mosheim, previously
referred to, stated that he had been so well educated that many had
looked on him as on an oracle. The English Baptist professor, Dr. Cramp,
says in his History of the Baptists: “Menno was a scholar of the first
rank.”]
3. a) Menno' s Doctrine
Menno’s doctrine is fully presented in the three books referred to
above: “Foundation of Christian Doctrine.” (Cf. below IV, 2). To our
knowledge, the Mennonite Publishing Company’s edition, Elkhart,
Indiana, of Mennos Saemtliche Werke is the best known.
b) Menno’s doctrines on church discipline, baptism and communion
are, for our purposes, satisfactorily treated in his “Withdrawal from
the Catholic Church” 29 The following quotations from his Be-
kenntnis von dem Dreieinigen ewigen und wahren Gott Vater Sohn
und Heiligen Geist (Confession of the Triune, Eternal and True God:
Father, Son and Holy Ghost) and other writings characterize his
position on the important doctrinal issues concerning God and Christ.
“We believe and confess, in accordance with the Scriptures, that
this one, eternal, omnipotent, inscrutable, invisible, inexpressible and
indescribable God is the eternal incomprehensible Father with His
incomprehensible Son and Holy Ghost. We confess that the Father
is true God, the Son is true God, and the Holy Ghost is true
16
ORIGINS
God— not according to human or comprehensible means, but according
to spiritual and incomprehensible means.” ‘‘I teach everyone simply and
correctly that Jesus Christ is true God and true man, the Son of God and
of man, conceived of the Holy Spirit and bom of the virgin Mary, a poor,
miserable [capable of suffering] man, like unto us in all things except
without sin.” “We believe and confess that the Holy Spirit is a true,
substantial or per
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…