← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 324 (not an original page number)
Unit 324 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for
correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may
be complete, equipped for every good work, II Pet. 1:19-21; Rom. 5:4; I
Tim. 6:11; II Tim. 2:21.
5.
“ Concerning the Renunciation of Property for
the Sake of the Poor
a) “The Anabaptists maintain that, according to God’s will, they
are to hold all goods in common. They demand that the wealthy
distribute their property amongst the poor.
b) “A community of goods has not been introduced amongst us, nor
do we consider such a scheme to be helpful under the present
circumstances; nevertheless, we do support each other financially if
someone is in need and is suffering, for that is but practicing a Christian
duty, so that each may serve with whatever gift God has blessed him , and
freely give according to his pleasure, for God loves a cheerful giver, II
Cor. 9:6-9.
a) “All property is considered common and is distributed in the
congregation according to need. If anyone is unwilling to submit to this, it
is decided either to hang or behead him . All valuables are forcefully
confiscated for the benefit of the group. The renunciation of all property
is required. And dissatisfaction with this procedure is punishable with
death. Whoever has more clothing than necessary must share his
surplus with the poor.
b)
41
Local Councils against Einlage
337
6 .
“ Concerning the Sensual Aberration in Polygamy
and Within the Marriage Bond
a) “The Anabaptists permit themselves all kinds of sensual
irregularities and practices which are against chastity.
b) "We flee from the company of the unfruitful works of darkness
and vigorously condemn all those who walk in the lusts of the flesh and
the passions of the world, for we who formerly served the flesh in its
lusts are very careful now to put aside everything that is contrary to the
Spirit of God. Because Christ died for those very sins, we are concerned
to live a life pleasing to God, Eph. 5:8-11.
a) “They proclaim the justness of polygamy.
b) “Just as God in the beginning created one man and one woman,
according to the same order we have no right to more than one wife. We
teach our members to live with their wives as though they did not have
them, rather than encourage them to have several wives, which is sinful
and worthy of condemnation.
a) “The wives have to subordinate themselves to the despotism of
their husbands, and are threatened with death if they are dissatisfied
with their lot.
b) “The manner in which husbands and wives are to live together
has been indicated above. No one amongst us is ever threatened with
death; on the contrary, there are many evidences of Christian love,
unity, and patience. [That is indeed the ideal!]
a) “Individuals who are about to be married must keep a prayer
vigil for three days, after which the marriage is contracted with a simple
mutual acceptance in the presence
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…