← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 327 (not an original page number)
Unit 327 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Br. Neufeld left the District of Chortitza and moved to
the city of Stavropol in the vicinity of the Kuban settlement [which was
once again brought to a state of turmoil for a time by him, partially in
the company of Johann Friesen of Gnadenheim and other adherents of
the excesses of 1864/1865]. The departure of Br. Heinrich Neufeld occurred
in the winter of 1865-1866. Two ministers were now elected on a
temporary basis: Br. Peter Friesen of Chortitza [d. in Wiesenfeld] and
Br. Aron Lepp [later an elder in Andreasfeld]. These men both tried to do
§152
340
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
their best in the Kingdom of God, and attempted to bring order into the
congregation on account of which [by one group] they were considered
legalistic and pharisaical. In the midst of these troubles Br. Unger looked
to Hamburg once again.
§153 2. Help from the Anabaptists of the Hamburg Confession: the first
visit of Brother August Liebig. As we know [H. Epp], Br. Unger was in
correspondence with the brethren from Hamburg. These people knew,
therefore, that there was still no organized church in the District of
Chortitza. As late as 1865 Br. Unger had suggested that several brethren
write to Hamburg requesting that a minister be sent to help organize the
church. The following brethren signed that request: Abraham Unger,
Cornelius Unger, Cornelius Fast, Johann Neufeld, Johann Loewen,
Hermann Bom, Heinrich Epp [the "reporter”] and Johann Epp. 132
“These men desired that the congregation be established on a secure
foundation,” which up to that time had not been the case. In the spring
of 1866, Minister August Liebig arrived [cf. above "Old- and
Neu-Danzig,”— Katalui in the Dobrudscha]. “God is a God of order. But
Br. Liebig found conflict and confusion in our church.” He began with an
address on Sunday, which the brothers and sisters found "very fine,
serious, and engaging.” Following this a “congregational meeting”
[brotherhood counsel] was arranged. Minister Liebig was asked to chair the
meeting. He immediately asked that someone be delegated to take minutes
of the proceedings— which was quite unknown to some brethren. Hearing
this, the chairman delivered "a very gentle lesson on the questionable
usefulness of a church meeting when nothing is recorded.” Many
brethren found that quite enlightening! So they followed his advice. The
most eloquent brethren spoke up; even before one had finished, he was
interrupted by another. They all remained seated while speaking. At this
the chairman interrupted the meeting with the words, "Brethren, this
is certainly not the way we do it. God is a God of order. He who wishes
to speak must rise to his feet and address the whole assembly, one after
the other. A speaker should not speak more than three times to the same
point, so that the consensus of the group can emerge.” Many felt this
latter comment to be enlightening, except those brethren "who were used
to making weighty sta
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…