← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 329 (not an original page number)
Unit 329 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
same "June
Reforms” of 1865 in principle (in spite of the fact that it was still
repeatedly shaken by the aftershocks of the early years, since many of
the most extreme elements of the two mother congregations had settled
342
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§156
in the new colony). At the same time, 1866 is of particular importance for
the Kuban congregation because of the final solemn confirmation of their
Mennonite ecclesiastical and civil rights by the Caucasian authorities on
the order of His Imperial Highness, the Grand Duke and Governor, of
May 30 of the same year under No. 2746 on Johann Claassen’s name as
the representative of the settlers.
A. Documents Relating Principally to the Events
in the Molotschna
1. Johann Claassen’s first journey to St. Petersburg on behalf of the
M.B. Church (supplement to #94). Taken from his letter of April 19,
1864, to the Kuban congregation written from Tiflis: . . On March 27,
1860, Br. Huebert and I drove to Halbstadt in order to confer with Elder
Harder regarding our concerns. But we soon saw that there was little
hope of help for us. On our return journey, just as the sun was about to
set, I pondered our situation: if the authorities would not protect
us ... we already knew what we could expect from the Mennonite
congregations. I was absorbed in my thoughts. Br. Huebert said to me:
‘You are so quiet!’ I answered: ‘If we want to do something, then this
is the time.’ 134 (Wednesday the Area Administrative Office would write
and summon me, I thought to myself, and then it would be too late.)
When I reached home, I told Cornelius Reimer (his brother-in-law and
business partner]: ‘I am setting out on a journey to the north, but do
not ask me where to.’ I continued: ‘Is money for travelling available?’
Cornelius answered: ‘Yes’— and the matter was settled. I said the same
thing to my wife, and she, too, did not enquire any further, although she
was not yet out of childbed .... This, dear brethren and sisters,
interests me and most likely also my wife, because the time of our
separation began at this point.
“On March 28 we quietly prepared for the trip; the house servants
may well have noticed something, but did not know what it was all
about. On Tuesday, the 29th of March, 2 o’clock at night the horse was
saddled; everybody slept. When I had completed this, I went to my wife
and prayed with her . . . and then I left. Cornelius Reimer accompanied
me to the river [the Tokmatschka, behind his garden]; then we took
leave of each other. I mounted my horse, which we had led out through
the garden. My brother-in-law wished me good luck, and so I left for
Kharkov.” In a letter to his wife, Claassen wrote: “St Petersburg, April
26, 1860. Beloved Katharina! First, I wish you the grace of the Lord
Jesus Christ ... 8 days I resided in Kharkov, because the rivers between
Kharkov and Moscow were just in the process of breaking up. . . . From
Kharkov ... by post to M
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…