← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 33 (not an original page number)
Unit 33 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
equally distant from the Roman
Catholic position of works righteousness as he was from the frivolous
Protestant position of salvation by faith alone without a sanctified life.
e) On the question of the relationship of church and state, Menno
was a resolute opponent of the state church or state Christianity. Christ
is the only kind and chief shepherd of the church. The state rightly has
jurisdiction over the entire civic, social and ethical sphere of life; it is in
this regard that the Christian owes absolute obedience to the state in so
far as its laws do not go against God’s Word. The only discipline to be
practiced by the church is admonition and separation (to put under the
ban) . Only those who live by the faith described above may be a part of
the church and enjoy its blessings of salvation and grace. Only these
may be baptized and take part in Holy Co mmuni on. “As long as a
person errs in faith and doctrine and retains a carnal mind, he may under
no circumstances be admitted to the body of the God-fearing and
penitent.” Foundation, vol. 1, p. 121 of the old Deknatel edition.
f) He rejected the swearing of oaths. From the general tenor of his
writings, some have drawn the conclusion that he deemed it unlawful for
a Christian to serve in the military or government, while others deny
this. We do not wish, at this point, to make a premature judgment, but
only quote a few of the most characteristic passages from his "Exhorting
Supplication to Magistrates”: "Christ wishes to remain the sole head of
His church, the only teacher in His school, the only king to judge His
kingdom, and that not by man-made laws or teachings nor by strangling
and murder, but by His Holy Spirit, power, grace and Word. Therefore
we, who recognize you as our gracious lords in all matters temporal, beg
you, who by God’s mercy are the foundations of the earth, to allow the
eternal and almighty king Jesus Christ to be the only Saviour, Lord and
Authority of our poor souls, as God the Father has ordained it. And that
you might fulfill the duties and obligations of the temporal office to
which you are called; for we desire with all our hearts to give to Caesar
what is Caesar’s and to God what is God's. Matt. 22:21. We petition
you, give serious consideration to our teaching. ...” In the treatise
“Confession of the Distressed Christians,” we read: "Dear Lords, seek
God, fear Him and serve Him with all your strength; do justice to
widows, orphans, strangers, the distressed and all the sorrowing; cleanse
your hands of blood, rule your lands with wisdom and in peace [he does
not say: leave your post, turn all your thoughts, words and deeds to the
crucified Christ and follow in His footsteps, therefore he must deem it
possible for magistrates to become disciples of Christ, otherwise why
18
ORIGINS
should he admonish them!] For, though your sins be as scarlet, they
shall be white as snow, etc. Is. 1:18, Ezek. 33:11, 18:32. May th
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…