← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 343 (not an original page number)
Unit 343 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
special difficulty, in a relationship of mutual counsel
and aid to the council representing all the churches, therefore, in a kind
of relationship of subordination, insofar as this seems really necessary.
The elders: Bernhard Fast, Benjamin Ratzlaff, Heinrich Toews, Peter
Wedel, Dirk Warkentin.”
But earlier a number of elders, with B. Fast at their head, had
already acted as a kind of “superior” group in matters pertaining to
Elder H. Wiens (see ##37 and 61). On page 116, Franz Isaak reports:
“After the reception of the administrative instruction [cited by Isaak] of
the president of the Supervisory Commission [August 14, 1846, in regard
to Elder Wiens], the entire religious leadership of the Mennonites was
invited to the Area Administrative Office and the instruction was read to
them [on 30th of August]. Wiens denied his unseemly conduct towards
His Excellency [in a personal conversation with Privy Councillor Hahn
in the Area Administrative Office, in regard to which matter Wiens was
now being accused] before this assembly and remained obstinate in his
stance. Thereupon, in the church at Ohrloff, Wiens was declared, by the
Elders Fast, Wedel, and Ratzlaff, to be unworthy of further service in
this office. Although Wiens was informed of this action, he nevertheless
totally ignored the written explanation of the above elders.” Thereupon
followed the decree of his banishment by the Administrative Office after
recommendation by the Commission. In another place Isaak quotes a
letter of the Colony Administrator Toews, a like-minded companion and
friend of Johann Coraies, wherein, among other things, one reads on
page 119: “After this [after the above-mentioned meeting of the entire
ministerial staff in the Area Administrative Office on August 30, 1846,
as recounted above], the Area Administrative Office and the Agricultural
Society wrote to the ministerial personnel of all the churches to deal with
Wiens [!] since the Area Administrative Office and the Society had
declared him unworthy [!]. Thereupon the Elder Bernhard Fast, Friedrich
Wilhelm Lange [cf. #49; why are Elders Ratzlaff and Wedel— and in the
earlier account, Lange— not mentioned here? A typographical error?] and
their ministers sent in a formal declaration of Wiens’ deposition, dated
Sept. 21, 1846, with the implication that in the future he not perform any
358
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
spiritual functions, and, failing this, he be reported [1] to the
governmental authorities as a disobedient person . A deputation to
the Commission, with the full authorization of many friends of Elder
Wiens, could not avert his fate. These new sources (which came to our
attention only after our book was essentially completed) explain ##35-38,
50 and 61 more clearly in this same sense: Coraies, whose greatness and
achievements are indisputable, but whose errors and eccentricities
cannot be hidden either, exerted strong control over the church with the
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…