← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 346 (not an original page number)
Unit 346 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
our position on communion and to receive it again
in the general (Mennonite) Church. However, when he saw that all his
admonitions were without effect, he promised that he would go to the
Department of the Minister of the Interior the next morning, where he
knew some influential persons. He made an appointment for us to return
the next day so that we might hear what he had been able to achieve.
The next morning we went to see Neumann for the third time and were
finally admitted. He received us cordially but said to Br Claassen right
at the outset: ‘Your affairs are in bad shape.’ Then he informed us that
the officials in all the departments, from the highest to the lowest,
regarded us as a divisive sect, which provided a dangerous example to
the Russian Church itself. Because of this there is not the slightest
sympathy in these departments for us; in fact, quite the contrary. [This
situation soon changed; cf. further Senator Hahn and other friends of
Claassen.] Neither would submitting a written petition to the Tsar help
us any, because the Tsar does not make decisions personally [?!] but
refers the issue to the ministry concerned. I must confess that when I
heard what he said, I lost all hope of success. I thought to myself: ‘our
right in this world is lost.’ From there we returned to Pastor Nielsen,
who told us that he had two matters that he wanted to impress upon us,
which he did in a very long speech which we were not permitted to
interrupt. His first point was this: to remain in the Mennonite colonies
and establish an independent church, without the approval of the elders
was an impossibility. For, he continued, if the elders and leaders
in the Mennonite brotherhood were to declare that they would not
recognize us, we would lose all claims on the ‘privileges.’ Therefore,
he again advised us to seek peace and to abandon our position on
communion and baptism. However, if this was completely impossible,
we should seek to retain our privileges by moving out and establishing a
separate colony. But where? The region of the Amur was not open for
reasons which he was not at liberty to share with us. However, in the
Crimea [in the whole area of Taurida] the land of the Nogai was being
sold. He advised us to quietly petition the head of the second
department, Gemgross, who was presently in Odessa, for permission to
make such a move. From Odessa the petition would go to the Governor
in Simferopol, I believe. Well, that is as far as we have come, dear
brothers and sisters. We sent you a telegram 146 the day before
Documentary Supplements
361
yesterday; we hope you have understood it. Claassen intends to make
several more efforts. Otherwise, God be praised and thanked, things are
going well! Plonus is a right gallant brother, with whom, except for his
legalism, 147 we can agree entirely. There is some prospect that I could
stay here and work as a colporteur. On the other hand, it does not seem
likely t
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…