← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 349 (not an original page number)
Unit 349 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
could
copy these down at home . . . We found a brother who translated these
for us, and I enclose a copy for you. Claassen was not at all satisfied with
these conditions and you probably will not be satisfied either
[Neumann wants to] make representations to the Minister of Finance
and he has hopes that better conditions will be forthcoming. The problem
is that now, just before the end of the year, all departments are
extremely busy, the more so since the question affecting the peasants
[abolition of serfdom] is to be decided by January 1. ... Today is the
second day in which I have again been working as a colporteur . . . .
There is an English and North American chapel here which ministers to
the English and North American people who have left the state church. I
like to go there because the English language is something of a hobby for
me, and I like the mini ster and the songs and the melodies which they
sing. Only the prayers in their prayer meetings do not appeal to me, for
these are as lamentable as those of our Christian [St Petersburg] friends
are . . . . O. Forchhammer.”
7. Johann Claassen’s “Peace Proposal.” (Cf. Petition to His
Majesty.)
“To the esteemed Area Administrative Office in Halbstadt. I
request and petition the esteemed Area Administrative Office to provide
me voluntarily with an annual pass and also with the required
documents, without which I cannot do anything when it comes to serious
negotiations in the matter of land purchase. I would also request that the
common rights of citizenship be no longer denied our church, and that it
not be disturbed in the practice of its worship services. I would also ask
that the Area Administrative Office speak to the ministers in
Rudnerweide and Pordenau so that they cease and desist from practicing a
boycott which hampers common business transactions and is r uinin g us
economically. That these burdens can become too heavy for us, especially
for me, since I have been separated from my family for such a long time,
any father who loves his family will understand. My papers will also
show that in whatever regard I have worked for settlement on crown
lands here, I have always written, spoken, and acted in the interests of
the whole. Therefore, those who think that I am trying to bring about
the abrogation of the rights of the colonies are seriously in error. For I
know full well that if we move out of the colonies, we will still be living in
this world, although it is also true that we will be living much more
quietly than here, where we are constantly being oppressed and
harrassed. From all of the enclosed papers, it will become evident to the
§162
364
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
Area Administrative Office that this is my final peace proposal. It will
also be clear that I am not prompted by personal preference, but that the
pressure of circumstances compels me to press for a decision— either our
rights are guaranteed to us by our h
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…