← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 351 (not an original page number)
Unit 351 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
d for 6 months, until
May 25, 1861. However, since my business kept me here much longer
than I expected and, moreover, since I had no idea how much longer it
might take, I went to the Privy Councillor, von Hahn, on the 3rd day of
Easter, April 25, concerning my need. I had been to see him several
times already during the preceding winter. He was very cordial and
invited me into his parlor. In response to his question as to whether I
was still in St. Petersburg, I answered yes, and told him what my
situation really was and what had happened since I last saw him. I told
him first of all about my efforts in the Ministry of Crown Lands
concerning resettlement, with the Under-Secretary of State and
Assistant Minister of Finance, Mr. von Hagemeister, with the Councillor
H. von Novosselsky, with the Assistant Minister of War, H. von
Miliutin, with Prince Bariatinsky, the brother of the Governor of the
Caucasus. Chiefly, we spoke of the settlement in the Caucasus. Secondly,
quite explicitly, I told his Excellency about the state of affairs in the
Molotschna, how things were going for us and what the real reason was
for my stay in St. Petersburg. In response to my question to his
Excellency as to whether I might write the Area Administrative Office
what he said to me, he arose and with a serious expression on his face,
said: ‘Yes, I permit you to write all of it.’ Becoming even more serious
and pointing at himself with his finger, he added: ‘And say that I said
it.’ I wish that the Area Administrative Office would understand his
Excellency and remember, in time, the many issues concerning the
colony which he has settled. Although H. von Hahn does not serve in the
Ministry of Crown Lands any longer, his attitude and his rank are
nonetheless significant, and as he himself said, he has friends there with
whom he has influence. Because my discussion with him lasted more
than an hour, there is too much for me to report, and too much for the
Area Administrative Office to read. I, therefore, have only written the
essentials of our conversation. Concerning the pass, his Excellency said:
‘To those who have paid their fees, as you have, a pass can in no wise be
denied, and the Area Administrative Office is legally bound to give one
to you.’ I further asked about my authorization. His Excellency said:
‘When a church draws up an authorization according to the provisions
of the law and signs it, then the Area Administrative Office is obliged to
ratify it, and that is not a matter of choice.’ I also asked him about the
Isaak Matthies case in Rudnerweide. His Excellency answered: ‘Those
who owe Isaak Matthies money and seek to hinder and ruin him by what
366
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
they are doing, must pay him the money coming to him. File a petition
on the matter; things like that cannot go on.’ Concerning the deputies
who must of necessity inspect the lands in question, his Excellency said,
excitedly: ‘Judge for
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…