← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 353 (not an original page number)
Unit 353 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
on that I have taken these measures which are also
unpleasant to me. I believe that these continuing controversies will not
only harm those who oppose us but also us with them. They may
actually jeopardize our privileges. The German colony, Karas, not far
from T iflis (from Piatigorsk!) in the Caucasus experienced this. I have
been told that their former privileges were greater than ours but through
continuous wrangling these have been greatly* diminished. St.
Petersburg, April 29, 1861. Johann Claassen from Liebenau.”
9. Claassen ’s Friends, Advisers, and Assistants in St. Petersburg.
a) Letters of Baron von Mirbach in Claassen’s cause. I. “Dear Mr.
Claassen! Soon after you had left, I had a fine opportunity to submit
your most humble petition [regarding land] to His Imperial Highness,
the Grand-duke K. Unfortunately, the Grand-duke did not accept the
petition. He said that it was none of his business, since he was so very
busy in the committee studying the peasant question that he could not
involve himself with matters pertaining to land or to related questions.
But you mi g ht turn to the Minister Muraviev. Prince Bariatinsky is
very ill and is abroad, so that he is not available to us. I regret very
much that I was not able to help you in this matter but I hope our dear
God will bless your efforts for the welfare of your church. Give my
kindest regards to our friend, Mr. Keller. With greetings to you,
Respectfully, Baron von Mirbach. April 18, 1861. P.S. Would you please
come to pick up your petition one of these days.” On the original copy
Claassen, in his own handwriting, has added this note to his wife: “This
letter, dear Katharina, you must carefully keep, so that no one can
misuse it; that would be abuse of confidence. Your Claassen.” In
addition, a note in Claassen’s handwriting: “Dear Katharina, here is a
brief summary to let you see with what sort of gentlemen I must deal
and many others with whom I have yet to deal .... Moreover, just
think, there is as yet no prospect: 1) Pastor Nielsen. 2) Mr. Neumann.
3) Privy Councillor Hahn. 4) Mr. Heinrichson of the Ministry of Crown
Lands. 5) His Excellency, Privy Councillor, Mr. von Hagemeister. 6) A
gentleman of the cabinet to whom I was referred by Mr. von
Hagemeister. His name I have forgotten [A. Klaus, according to a note
from him to Claassen, at that time still a young official]. 7) His
Excellency, Privy Councillor, Mr. von Novosselsky. 8) Major General
Doctor Schmidt. 9) His Excellency, Privy Councillor, Mr. von Warneck.
10) Colonel Lemm. 11) Prince Bariatinsky. 12) Major [Baron] von
Mirbach. 13) Assistant to the Minister of War, Miliutin. 14) Mr.
Zaremba. 15) Major General Kolossovsky from the Caucasus. 16) Major
General von Blaremberg. And then add to these some ten brethren and
§164
368
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
friends who showed me favors insofar as they could .... The men who
would like to help me, cannot, and those who
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…