Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 353 (not an original page number)

Unit 353 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
on that I have taken these measures which are also unpleasant to me. I believe that these continuing controversies will not only harm those who oppose us but also us with them. They may actually jeopardize our privileges. The German colony, Karas, not far from T iflis (from Piatigorsk!) in the Caucasus experienced this. I have been told that their former privileges were greater than ours but through continuous wrangling these have been greatly* diminished. St. Petersburg, April 29, 1861. Johann Claassen from Liebenau.” 9. Claassen ’s Friends, Advisers, and Assistants in St. Petersburg. a) Letters of Baron von Mirbach in Claassen’s cause. I. “Dear Mr. Claassen! Soon after you had left, I had a fine opportunity to submit your most humble petition [regarding land] to His Imperial Highness, the Grand-duke K. Unfortunately, the Grand-duke did not accept the petition. He said that it was none of his business, since he was so very busy in the committee studying the peasant question that he could not involve himself with matters pertaining to land or to related questions. But you mi g ht turn to the Minister Muraviev. Prince Bariatinsky is very ill and is abroad, so that he is not available to us. I regret very much that I was not able to help you in this matter but I hope our dear God will bless your efforts for the welfare of your church. Give my kindest regards to our friend, Mr. Keller. With greetings to you, Respectfully, Baron von Mirbach. April 18, 1861. P.S. Would you please come to pick up your petition one of these days.” On the original copy Claassen, in his own handwriting, has added this note to his wife: “This letter, dear Katharina, you must carefully keep, so that no one can misuse it; that would be abuse of confidence. Your Claassen.” In addition, a note in Claassen’s handwriting: “Dear Katharina, here is a brief summary to let you see with what sort of gentlemen I must deal and many others with whom I have yet to deal .... Moreover, just think, there is as yet no prospect: 1) Pastor Nielsen. 2) Mr. Neumann. 3) Privy Councillor Hahn. 4) Mr. Heinrichson of the Ministry of Crown Lands. 5) His Excellency, Privy Councillor, Mr. von Hagemeister. 6) A gentleman of the cabinet to whom I was referred by Mr. von Hagemeister. His name I have forgotten [A. Klaus, according to a note from him to Claassen, at that time still a young official]. 7) His Excellency, Privy Councillor, Mr. von Novosselsky. 8) Major General Doctor Schmidt. 9) His Excellency, Privy Councillor, Mr. von Warneck. 10) Colonel Lemm. 11) Prince Bariatinsky. 12) Major [Baron] von Mirbach. 13) Assistant to the Minister of War, Miliutin. 14) Mr. Zaremba. 15) Major General Kolossovsky from the Caucasus. 16) Major General von Blaremberg. And then add to these some ten brethren and §164 368 THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH friends who showed me favors insofar as they could .... The men who would like to help me, cannot, and those who

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…