← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 367 (not an original page number)
Unit 367 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
emissaries also succeeded in winning a not
insignificant number of followers for their views and tearing them from
the church. Pastor Doenhoff of the Gololubovka Church, as a result, felt
obligated to write a series of pastoral letters which appeared in the 1861
and 1862 issues of the Sonntagsblatt, published in St. Petersburg by
Bertholdi, formerly by Pastor Sieberg. These letters described the false
teachings that had spread there and refuted them in a truly apostolic
mann er in accordance with Scripture. 164 The Saratov office for foreign
Documentary Supplements
381
settlers on the Volga complained to our Supervisory Commission in
Odessa about the mischief which the two apostles had created there and
requested the latter to give strict orders to the Area Administrative
Office of the Molotschna Mennonite District not to issue passes in future
to persons of such character for that type of activity, r) After one of the
two apostles had secretly led an immoral life for a period of time, one of
his partners in sin eventually became mother of a child. Since Easter,
1862, they publicly live together as a married couple, having been joined
in matrimony by their bishop. 165 s) The above-named Johann Claassen,
the most decisive and fanatical representative of the sect, knowing that
their disobedience and resistance to our government must eventually
result in legal censure, suddenly went off to St. Petersburg in order to
save his skin. There he knew of friends also in favor of establishing free
churches. He hoped with their help to contact the highest authorities on
behalf of his associates. The church elders and the Area Administrative
Office did not thwart them in any way except that the Area Office,
because of the instructions received from the Supervisory Commission,
did not send him a monthly pass until receipt of specific permission to do
so. t) Hopefully, from this presentation of the truth it will be clear to
every unprejudiced reader that those members who have left us have no
valid reason to complain about coercive measures and persecutions
because of their faith and Christian living. And even if they should be
punished according to law by the Russian government for successfully
proselytizing a considerable number of members from the Russian state
church, they could not boast of any religious persecution but would be
suffering only the due reward of their deeds according to state and
church laws and the Holy Scriptures, Romans 13:1-6 and I Peter
2:13-17. 166 No government, no church administration, and no law
hinders us from believing and living a true Christian life here in Russia,
according to God’s Word and our privileged church constitution, as the
‘quiet of the land’ and we can be as happy here as is possible anywhere
on earth. The only limitations set for us by the state and church laws
concern the forming of new sects and proselytizing, which we undertook
to observe as good and faithful R
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…