← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 370 (not an original page number)
Unit 370 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
earnestness. Oh that His work of grace might succeed in
softening many, yes, all those with hearts still unbroken, to make them
sensitive and accessible for the blessed indwelling of the Holy Spirit!
Indeed, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for the lost members who
have left our congregations is that the Lord might turn them from the
error of their way and help them in good time to recognize their arrogant
mind and to bring them to a genuine repentance before they plunge
themselves and their children into temporal misery and ruin. In sincere
brotherly love, united with you in the Lord, your August Lenzmann,
elder of the Gnadenfeld Church.”
II. This letter, though written in brilliantly precise language, is
theologically and ecclesiastically one-sided, short-sighted, narrow-minded,
and lacking in Christian love. It shall not be, as far as we are concerned,
the ideal epitaph on the gravestones of the signatory and his secretary,
the Minister Heinrich Franz, Sr. Both of them were worth much more
384
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
than this their letter, written in evil times, which betrays the fever that
existed in the Mennonite body and from which it strove to expel the
unhealthy fluids, and which expressed itself in the exaggerations of
Lenzmann and associates on the one side, and those of the seceders on
the other. The spume, the sediment, the dirt, and the bitter leaven must
be separated during the fermentation; the strength of the wine remains.
Our epitaph for Lenzmann and Franz shall be that which was said above
in Chapter IX, “Gnadenfeld” and at the conclusion of Chapter XVII.
§169 14. Klaus, in Our Colonies, refutes Elder Lenzmann, p. 289:
“. . . Meanwhile, the government finally became convinced that the
accusations brought against the ‘Huepfer’ —that they were immoral,
disobedient to the authorities, etc.— were in fact unfounded . . .
(Compare above #160.)
§170 15. Pastor Dobbert’s Report. Compare XII above, “Pastor Wuest”
2.d, and XVII. Our own copy of the following document bears the
superscription: “Received from Minister Franz Isaak as authentic, in the
spring of 1896, D. Schellenberg,” [Elder of the M.B. Church,
Molotschna, Rueckenau].
a) “A correct understanding of the religious movement which has
emerged among the Mennonites during recent years, particularly the
Claassen schism, is scarcely possible without going back a few years and
considering the activities of a man who exercised an unusual and special
influence here; I am referring to Pastor Wuest. When the Royal
Consistory in Wuerttemberg effected changes in the liturgy and
introduced a new hymnal, many wanted to preserve for themselves and
their children that which had been transmitted to them. Russia
befriended those who left their homeland for conscience sake and
provided them with shelter. They settled on the Berda in four colonies
and were granted the freedom to use their own books, among them the
fine hymnal, a
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…