← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 380 (not an original page number)
Unit 380 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
about it aloud. And if someone has a revelation, that person is to stand
up and share his revelation with the rest, one after the other, so that all
can be edified. If someone desires to praise the Lord in between, let him
do so, even if five or six do so one after the other, for our meeting is
increasing in size, filling the room and house (entrance way). Thus far we
have always read around the circle, but some read so quietly that those
in the back could not hear anything, and when there was any discussion
they could not all hear either and so it did not take long until there was
such a confused babel that no one could understand anything. That is
why we made the following arrangements ... so that the weak, too, who
find themselves in our meetings, might be edified .... After we have
been refreshed from the Word of God, we let forth our praise to
God. Many times there is such an outpouring, hearts are so stirred, that
one can not wait for the next, someone else steps into the pool of
Bethesda first, and five or six are often praising together. Time often
runs out on us when we begin to praise God, but praise God, there is a
day coming which will be long enough. We also often t hink about
you .... Do write to let us know whether you object to one of us going
to them to preach according to their lesson guide [in the ‘church’
services in the schools: cf. further 17] ... . (2) A child dedication service
was conducted in your house [conducted— cf. #48— according to the
Gnadenfeld manner, which was a rule in the young M.B. Church. It is
frequently mentioned that Huebert or Becker ‘embraced and
dedicated’ little children in the meetings]; the children of the Penners
of Landskrone were dedicated, and those of Voth from Kakbas
Jakob Becker.”
b) Minister Jacob Martens, Tiegenhagen, of the Orloff-Halbstadt
congregation, wrote to the publisher of Mennonitische Blaetter on
§171
394
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
December 20, 1862: . . As a consequence of a number of letters
received concerning Johann Claassen, who on this account is in St.
Petersburg, the Area Administrative Office felt obligated to make a visit
to Odessa. Several ministers of the church travelled in their company,
carrying with them the statement of June 10, 1861 [above #103].
Prompted by this document, several mini sters and members of the
Orloff-Halbstadt congregation on several occasions made visits to the
meetings of the secessionists, from which they sometimes put things down
in writing. . . [Mennonitische Bloetter, Feb., 1863].
c) Mrs. Claassen, to her husband in St. Petersburg: “Liebenau,
July 24, 1861 .... The ministers of the Orloff congregation notified us
that if we were to come together this Sunday [July 23] in Liebenau and
hold our worship service as usual, several of their ministers wanted
to attend. . . . Harder [Minister Bernhard H.] made notes of the
things said by Benjamin [Becker, ordained as circuit minister] and
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…