← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 411 (not an original page number)
Unit 411 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ere excommunicated, solely
because of differences of understanding?] For a long time now, we have
not experienced such joy, for since that time the congregation has still
lacked a unity of the spirit. Now, however, everyone who had defiled
himself confessed his sins and all became united in the spirit, e) Brother
Huebert 201 also has long ceased walking in faith. He was admonished
before the whole congregation and was warned that, if he did not deeply
repent from where he had fallen, he could not remain a minister. But the
other day, during the meeting of the congregation, he deeply humbled
himself, also toward Wieler, because he had not loved him. In his prayer
before all of us, he tearfully confessed that he had stood on the edge of
hell. But God, who is rich in mercy, had once more rescued him, and for
this he was thankful to God. The entire congregation began to weep for
joy, so that Brother Huebert was enlivened again to struggle for the
faith of the Gospel once for all delivered to the saints, Jude 1. Now, dear
brothers and sisters, receive the word of exhortation, which we have
written to you, for your good, so that we may again rejoice because of
you, and you with us, until we all arrive at one faith and understanding
of the Son of God, and become a perfect man. f) I am also writing you
that Bernhard Penner has been dedicated by the whole congregation for
the ministry of the Word and for teaching. Jakob Franz [Liebenau] has
been chosen as a minister, and Fast from Schoenau has been elected to
the ministry also. . . . Amen. Your Brother Benjamin Becker.” 202
[More letters of this tone from Br. B. are available. This is sufficient for
us.]
4. Growth of the Church in a Dismal Period (Supplement to #120).
In this confused and sad time it pleased God nonetheless to send to the
church new and entirely differently disposed elements from the circle of
believers and seekers in the Ohrloff Church (from which Elder Huebert
had come). These were the fruit of the activities of Tobias Voth and
Bernhard Fast, their associates and followers of similar persuasion. One
can only ascribe to the gracious and wise providence of God the fact that
people now joined the M.B. Church, not looking on the spectacles and
emotionalism as described in the above-mentioned places, nor on the
chaos of that time, but rather on the basic principles and goals. In
Documentary Supplements
425
summer, 1864, just before the wildest outbursts of emotionalism and
arbitrariness, five who later became elders, joined (they were co-elders
and stewards)— Daniel Fast, school teacher in Blumenort, who naturally
immediately lost his position— now, after many years of service, since
1892 retired elder at the Kuban; his nephew (son of his sister), Johann
J. Fast, later widely known as an itinerant minister, representative of
elders and co-elder (a “mother” to the church in soul care); he passed
away in Rueckenau in 1892; Jacob Jantz, elder
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…