← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 414 (not an original page number)
Unit 414 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ot be with you in the way in which you are now
against each other .... Katharina Claassen.” b) This summons to an
accounting is also mentioned in a letter from Heinrich Huebert, January
13, 1865. This one, and the next letter of January 2, which present this
worthy man in his most unfavorable light, as weak and yielding, as was
stated in a previous footnote, and as is abundantly apparent from a
comparison of his letters with Jakob R’s diary notation of December 6,
and B.B.’s letter of the 14-19th of the same month. Only after God,
through Claassen, had tamed the “inflated apostles” and leaders of
excessive exuberance, his former “closest brothers,” could Huebert,
supported by the circle of men mentioned in section 4 above, become for
the M.B. Church that for which God had given him to the church. He
writes: “Liebenau, January 2, 1865. (1) To the church on the Kuban, in
God our Father and Lord Jesus Christ! With this greeting of the Apostle
Paul in the second letter to the Thessalonians, verses 1 and 2, I, your
servant, come into your midst in the spirit. My deepest wish would be
that I might be able to say in truth about you what the apostle says in
the following section of Chapter 1! I expect to send this letter from
Berdiansk, for I have discovered that my letters have not come to you.
Concerning this I can only assume that they have been held back in
Halbstadt. From Br. Benjamin you will probably receive at the same
time an earnest exhortation and a list of members who have been
excommunicated by us. [Compare the letter of December 14-19.] This
writing has been read to the whole church and approved by all. I would
like to report something, from my viewpoint, of the events which have
occurred here since the absence of Br. Benjamin. Several of you who were
still here know of the relationship between Brother Benjamin and myself
until the time of the meeting of the brotherhood in Landskrone on July
13. All of us who were opposed to him, acknowledged our error, humbled
ourselves and were reconciled. But this had not happened according to
the devil’s wishes; his plans, as always, were to divide and separate the
flock of Christ. The matter was to be raised even higher on the pinnacle
of the temple. New reports from the Old Colony, no doubt brought here
by impure souls, of excommunications of many members again aroused
the suspicion that autocratic methods by Brother [Gerhard] Wieler and
Benjamin 205 had crept in there, especially since according to the
teaching of the apostle, there is a possibility that false teachers and
deceivers will arise from among the believers. The time came when Br. G.
Wieler also came here to put everything on the right track. I and Br.
Jakob Franz spent the night of December 15 to 16 in Ladekopp; then the
brethren of the Old Colony also came there: G. Wieler, Peter Neufeld and
428
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
Benjamin Nickel. I did not find in Br. Wieler that which I had e
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…