← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 418 (not an original page number)
Unit 418 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
e flesh are
deceivers. This certainly may not rightly be said of them [those who
according to Huebert's letter of January 4 had been excommunicated in
Documentary Supplements
431
Einlage]; no more than of those believers who do not completely agree
with us, whether living here or far away among the heathen or elsewhere,
but known to us as Christians. Up to the present we could not do
without the work of Luther, Hiller and many other men of faith. Let us
therefore be careful not to judge them, for in so doing we shall judge
ourselves, according to Romans 2:1. Philippians 1:18 states: Only that
in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed. It is
therefore advisable to be careful not to reject the efforts of others who
are working for the kingdom of God, since we too are so prone to error,
and since so much error has occurred among the brethren, long ago as
well as in recent times.
2) “Banning also is not done according to the Word of God. I
Timothy 5:20 states: Those who sin, rebuke in the presence of all, etc.,
and according to I Corinthians 5:4. According to this, six or seven
brethren— that is, if they do not constitute an entire church— do not
have the right to find others of like mind and judge someone. Menno, the
reformer, gives very good advice in this matter, and it should be taken to
heart in this issue as well as in many others, since it is known that the
brethren do not reject the Foundation of Menno; indeed, one of their
leaders has recognized the work and presented it, as our basic principles,
to high authority. [Apparently G. Wieler is meant; see his petition to the
Tsar, above?] Also, in their attitude toward the banned ones the brethren
contradict the accepted confession of faith as expressed in a catechism
[the ‘Rudnerweider’]. If, in the ban, the leaders of the brethren are
relying on the Apostle Paul, who personally exercised the ban on
occasion, they should read Acts 20, from verse 18 to the end of the
chapter, as well as II Corinthians 11, from verse 28 to the end. Then they
will arrive at a different conclusion, provided they have some of that
spirit of discernment of which they are boasting; if not, they should ask
themselves if what Paul says in II Cor. 11:12-15 applies to them.
3) “The esteem of persons. This is forbidden in the letter of James,
yet it was clearly evident in the last meeting of the brethren, for
unreasonable, carnally-minded zealots, who in the previous meeting of
the brethren contended for the law, were justified; others— their loving
and gentle convictions belittled by some brethren and, on the basis of the
new covenant, generally declared to be evil— were threatened with the
ban if they did not abandon their convictions and humble themselves to
the satisfaction of their opponents.
4) "The God-blessed life. In I Timothy 4:8, 9 we read: Train yourself
in godliness, for while bodily exercise is of some value, godliness holds
promi
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…