← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 420 (not an original page number)
Unit 420 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
hren, we are prepared to go hand in hand
with you as pilgrims to the heavenly Jerusalem; failing this, to all
those— but only those— who are against us, we say— Farewell! For we
see, as clearly as you do, the leading brethren, that thus far we are not of
one spirit with you. But do not say that we went out from you; for then
you would be doing to us according to the example of Diotrephes, III
Documentary Supplements
433
John 9, 10. You, who wish to be held in high regard, will not receive us,
but prevent those who wish to do so. You put us out of the church, and
with us [you put out] many from among you, who stand close to you.
You may call our action denial of the cross; we cannot prevent that, any
more than we can prevent your other misinterpretations. The future will
show if it is so. We believe, at least, that we have acted in the name of
the Lord. (6) In conclusion, we have this plea: do not condemn us,
neither shall we condemn you. Let us leave this to Him who judges
rightly. Up there we shall perhaps agree, for there we shall see
everything clearly. Blumenort, April 1, 1865. Daniel Fast,” etc.
9. The Excessive Exuberance and Spiritual Despotism in the
Chortitza-Einlage M.B. Church.
a) This church during the same time also had its “wild year.”
Despite the fact that those of the Molotschna, with the Becker brothers
in the lead, their guilt shared by Johann Claassen, stimulated the
ridiculous and unseemly excessive exuberance, all evidence indicates that
the chief proponent of this religious aberration, and the prime originator
of this terrible spiritual tyranny was Br. Gerhard Wieler. All letters and
written documents, as well as all oral reports we have received from 1866
until the 70s, present him in this light.
b) Johann Wieler, the younger brother of Gerhard, writes to Johann
Claassen: “Einlage, February 4, 1865. Dear Brother Claassen, beloved in
Christ Jesus! Grace, mercy and peace from God the Father and our Lord
Jesus Christ be with you. [We present only the most noteworthy parts of
the very long letter.] A conference of the brethren was called, where the
brethren confessed their errors and shortcomings to each other. [This
probably was a practice adopted from the Molotschna, probably stemming
from the days of Wuest but now perhaps distorted.] Those who had no
pretensions against anyone were declared to have died, since they could
not distinguish between light and darkness. The brethren parted without
having been reconciled, each aggrieved by the other .... I constantly
asked myself: Where do I find similar actions in the Word of God, where
is it written, that the flock of Christ is to be fed in this manner? . . .
Gerhard Wieler gave me the harsh response, that it was none of my
business how he was building! ... As I had expected, such treatment of
the souls made quarreling and fighting a daily occurrence in our church.
Gerhard Wieler mercilessly attacked those brothers and sister
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…