← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 422 (not an original page number)
Unit 422 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
church] .... On
the next day Benjamin Becker ... at once very humbly (??) asked
forgiveness of Gerhard Wieler, received his blessing, and went to the
Molotschna, to appear there with the same honor as G. Wieler ....
Johann Wieler, Abraham Unger, Jakob Koslowsky.” [All signatures are
in the hand of J. Wieler.]
c) Abraham Unger to Daniel Fast. “Einlage, February 12, 1865. . . .
In the few hours when we were able to be together, I noticed that you are
Documentary Supplements
435
one of those who, with all earnestness, or, in the words of Paul, with fear
and trembling, are working out their salvation. ... I am ashamed that,
even if I did not remain silent, I have not long ago withdrawn from such
a fellowship. ... I therefore advise you to oppose boldly those false
doctrines, as the Word of God bears witness to your conscience, f A fruit
of this exhortation no doubt was the writing in 8.] And if they do not
hear you, then save your soul. ... It is the same spirit as the one in
Kronsweide twelve years ago! ... It is the same spirit as the one in the
Molotschna Colony three years ago [during the Antinomianism in the
‘unbalanced year,’ winter 1861-62] . . . and Benjamin Becker does not
regard it as sin, when brothers and sisters [‘in the Lord’] dance a waltz
[in a ‘worship service!’] till the sweat goes through their clothes!
Brother, this foolishness is breaking my heart. . . .”
10. Johann Wieler evaluates conditions at that time in the M.B. §190
Church in both regions, as recorded in his “My Thoughts,” 208 June,
1882. “In a word, there was greater concern for the pleasure of the
Christians than for the solution of problems about the Kingdom of God.
As a result of this one-sided approach, our church got onto the wrong
track and was threatened with destruction. By pursuing spiritual joys,
our church developed characteristics which distanced it increasingly from
Christian gentleness, careful behavior, brotherly love, humility, com-
passion, demonstrating a divine likeness. Instead of this there was
spiritual pride, careless behavior, pride. ... A caricature of sad erring
still comes to mind when I think of our church in that period. Only God’s
grace was still mercifully with His people. He still found something good
among His sheep who had partly gone astray. In those days there were
always some brethren who repeatedly recovered their balance and tried
to use their influence for good among the other members. . . .’’ [August,
1882] "In the church in the Old Colony, in the Province of Ekaterinoslav,
it was the honored, now deceased Abraham Unger who provided
energetic opposition to this unrestrained movement. ... 209 Brother
Unger always had an idea which remained with him during all the
storms: it was that the church of God was to be quiet, honorable and
loving [see his letter of June 15, 1861, #Ii5], thus being a witness to the
world, and be involved in missions to the family, schools, nominal
Chr
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…