← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 430 (not an original page number)
Unit 430 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
whole work of
reform in the summer of 1865 would most certainly have come to nothing
at all. On the one hand, Claassen was accepted by Abraham Unger,
Daniel Fast, and Abraham Comelsen, and on the other hand also
enjoyed the complete confidence of men such as Benjamin Becker and
Heinrich Neufeld, and both sides could respect his innate honesty and
Documentary Supplements
443
purity. His sympathetic manner, his warm “love for the brethren,” his
ability to be flexible and gentle like a fine diplomat, yet always for the
supreme purpose of discovering God’s will only, and to fulfill it, made
him , in the hands of God, into the savior of the M.B. Church. That the
consequences of the “June Reforms” were more far-reaching than the
wording of the minutes and sharper in their effect than had been
intended is typical of such situations. They were sharper than Br.
Claassen wished them to be, since he was a man who always dealt with a
soft touch in church matters (as we have discovered from personal
experience). Every major statement of a reforming idea arising from the
necessities of life results in more drastic consequences, in both the
smaller and larger circles, them the tone of the statement itself: Luther,
in his Theses of 1517, did not yet have the Confessio Augustana of 1530
in mind. In any case, after this event the M.B. Church in the Molotschna
and in a few years’ time the whole M.B. Church in Russia and North
America became more like the Kleine Gemeinde (more puritanical in
attitude, somewhat melancholic and formalistically-ascetically pious)
rather than like the “Huepfer.” That was the way the author found it
when he became a member of the M.B. Church in the summer of 1866 at
the Molotschna— only one year after the June Reforms! Mennonite to
the core, in temperament. For example, with respect to music there is not
one church amongst fifty M.B. congregations in Russia that uses music
in the regular services (although in some private meetings and for special
festivities some choirs made up of the music groups of the younger
members of the local church do participate). In contrast to this, the
Mennonite Church at Gnadenfeld— once the mother church but now the
strong opponent of the M.B. Church— has placed an organ in its
sanctuary— probably the only (?) Mennonite church in Russia to own
one. 222
Thoughts concerning the right use or misuse of expressions of joy in
Christian meetings are expressed by a contemporary of the movements
of “excessive joy” and the “despotism” by Br. Johann Wieler, now
deceased, in his “My Thoughts,” from whom we have already quoted
earlier, of July, 1882: “. . . If we ask in the light of God’s Word: Does
the church of God not have the right to rejoice in the Lord and to
express this joy in singing, shouting, clapping of hands, or dancing and
leaping in a circle as the Israelites did in the Old Testament when they
were saved from the power of Pharaoh and escaped through th
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…