Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 430 (not an original page number)

Unit 430 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
whole work of reform in the summer of 1865 would most certainly have come to nothing at all. On the one hand, Claassen was accepted by Abraham Unger, Daniel Fast, and Abraham Comelsen, and on the other hand also enjoyed the complete confidence of men such as Benjamin Becker and Heinrich Neufeld, and both sides could respect his innate honesty and Documentary Supplements 443 purity. His sympathetic manner, his warm “love for the brethren,” his ability to be flexible and gentle like a fine diplomat, yet always for the supreme purpose of discovering God’s will only, and to fulfill it, made him , in the hands of God, into the savior of the M.B. Church. That the consequences of the “June Reforms” were more far-reaching than the wording of the minutes and sharper in their effect than had been intended is typical of such situations. They were sharper than Br. Claassen wished them to be, since he was a man who always dealt with a soft touch in church matters (as we have discovered from personal experience). Every major statement of a reforming idea arising from the necessities of life results in more drastic consequences, in both the smaller and larger circles, them the tone of the statement itself: Luther, in his Theses of 1517, did not yet have the Confessio Augustana of 1530 in mind. In any case, after this event the M.B. Church in the Molotschna and in a few years’ time the whole M.B. Church in Russia and North America became more like the Kleine Gemeinde (more puritanical in attitude, somewhat melancholic and formalistically-ascetically pious) rather than like the “Huepfer.” That was the way the author found it when he became a member of the M.B. Church in the summer of 1866 at the Molotschna— only one year after the June Reforms! Mennonite to the core, in temperament. For example, with respect to music there is not one church amongst fifty M.B. congregations in Russia that uses music in the regular services (although in some private meetings and for special festivities some choirs made up of the music groups of the younger members of the local church do participate). In contrast to this, the Mennonite Church at Gnadenfeld— once the mother church but now the strong opponent of the M.B. Church— has placed an organ in its sanctuary— probably the only (?) Mennonite church in Russia to own one. 222 Thoughts concerning the right use or misuse of expressions of joy in Christian meetings are expressed by a contemporary of the movements of “excessive joy” and the “despotism” by Br. Johann Wieler, now deceased, in his “My Thoughts,” from whom we have already quoted earlier, of July, 1882: “. . . If we ask in the light of God’s Word: Does the church of God not have the right to rejoice in the Lord and to express this joy in singing, shouting, clapping of hands, or dancing and leaping in a circle as the Israelites did in the Old Testament when they were saved from the power of Pharaoh and escaped through th

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…