← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 439 (not an original page number)
Unit 439 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
rs’ residence [Hermann, who severed all ties with the church and
later initiated the ‘Breadbreaker’ Church, cf #119], in order to acquaint
ourselves more fully with his position .... We greeted him with the
words: ‘Peace be with you!’ but received the harsh reply, ‘There is no
peace! Peace, peace where there is no peace; Christ came not to bring
peace but the sword and division.’ We replied, 'But not between children
of God?’ He responded, ‘You are no children of God; rather you are
scribes and pharisees to whom it is said, “Woe, Woe.” You strain at
gnats and swallow camels, you lead souls to destruction, you are
arrogant ones, novices, and chatterers, who distort God’s Word, have no
faith, no peace, and no salvation.’ He considered himself fortunate that
he was free from that devil’s crowd in which he had lain bound and
oppressed. He hoped that the Lord would keep him from falling away
from his present condition again. Br. Claassen had brought them
together with diseased [scabby] sheep, but the Lord had again led his
own forth, and if we would not turn away from our error, we would
perish. We were among those who bypassed love and mercy, and went
about destroying individuals. And other s imilar expressions. We told
him that he was condemning himself and speaking his own judgment;
then we left. The door had barely closed behind us when they began
singing loudly in order to still their accusing consciences. Saddened by
such an event, we went to our brothers and sisters, related how we had
been received by Peters, and exhorted them to remain in the love of the
Lord. . . .” [The two itinerant preachers had many s imilar experiences
with the followers of Peters. Regarding one such occasion they wrote],
“. . . After further questioning it became obvious that he had come to a
clear understanding with the tambourine and was inclined to it. . . .”
[After being treated in a similar way on another occasion, the travellers
concluded], “that to do and to practice are more blessed than to speak
much about laws and commandments and not to practice those things,
(2) Retrospect and Prospect
453
as we have experienced so frequently from those who accuse us of
lovelessness and mercilessness, we have been very harshly accused by
them without demonstration of love. No man of the world has treated us
as they did, and that because of their obsession with the tambourine and
similar things . . .
p) ‘‘[From Steinfeld to] . . . Steinbach at Nikolai Schmidts [at that
time associate leader in the ‘Temple Church’; cf. above, ‘Brotherhood’
and ‘Brotherhood School,’ #51 and #52]. ... In the evening we had an
edifying discussion regarding God’s mercy to us poor sinners .... N.
Schmidt took us to Elizabethtal to Br. Klaassen’s .... After breakfast
Br. Franz Janzen (Pordenau) demonstrated his love and took us to
Franztal to Mr. Braun (an old brother who was a follower of Wuest but
had not left the church). He had long awaited ou
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…