Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 441 (not an original page number)

Unit 441 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
ee the episode with G. Wieler and others), now interceded for Huebert in order to provide bond for his release from the imprisonment where he was being held for questioning. Above one of the songs he composed while in prison, Huebert wrote in his own hand: “After the security which the village community at Liebenau offered on my behalf was denied, and I was forced to discover new resources of patience. . . .” Always known as a law-abiding, sober, and morally upright man of honor, he was now a virtual martyr, pitied all the more and more highly esteemed, because although he did not baptize the Russian woman (the accusation against him) he refused to divulge the name of the person who did. His failure to deal with the “Exuberant Movement” had been excused, and was scarcely remembered any more by those inside or outside the M.B. Church. All anger and resentment was directed without restraint against the “self-made apostles.” (G. Wieler, for example, was called “a fallen angel” by the believers of the now purified M.B. Church at Ohrloff when he rejoined the Mennonite Church at Chortitza.) Furthermore, Christian Schmidt and Jakob Janz, who had recently been named as “assistant ministers” (on August 29, 1865) were accepted everywhere as angels of peace by those who had withdrawn from the mother church, except by a large number of those living in the district of the "five elders” who had not become irreconcilable enemies or been grossly offended by the ‘ ‘renegades.” Great things were expected of these men amongst the believers and the revived Mennonite Church as well as from the moderates of the “Friends of Jerusalem” group, such as Nikolai Schmidt and Abraham Wiebe, who never ceased being pietists. (We vividly recall a glorious sermon on the (2) Retrospect and Prospect 455 Prodigal Son preached by Nikolai Schmidt— now long since deceased but who at that time had left the church at Gnadenfeld and joined the "Temple Church.’’) It took place in the winter of 65/66 at a private gather- ing in Alexanderthal in a group meeting of revived, penitent souls. His glowing countenance, the tears in his eyes, the deeply moving, vibrant voice, his warm personality, and simple yet suitable mode of dress made him the most appealing of evangelical ministers and the ideal man— this sermon remains today, after a lapse of almost 45 years, an unforgettable event. In all he said and did and in his total being he was a true ambassador of the Father to all lost sons and daughters. As far as the two brethren J. Janz and Christian Schmidt are concerned, they were indeed the ideal messengers of love and peace. The fruit of an early conversion, they were young men in the full bloom of youth and youthful innocence (in so far as it is possible for any son of Adam to show this), whose friendliness and love for God and man was much in evidence, and who were still without that hardness that the trials of life invariably imprint on all

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…