← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 446 (not an original page number)
Unit 446 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
have their names on church registers— nevertheless, she still accepts all
true believers, and practices patience with those who may lack
knowledge (according to the M.B. viewpoint), and with them celebrates
the intimate spiritual joys and life experiences at the Lord’s table, after
the event which took place around St. Martin’s in Elizabethal, as well as
some time before and after (cf. XIII above), s) It is to be said with
respect to point (o) above concerning the free celebration of co mmunio n
in the wider circle of the brethren, that in the more recent years since
1900 various elders and ministers from the Mennonite Church have
repeatedly conducted such services.
XXVI.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MENNONITE BRETHREN
CHURCH OF THE CHORTITZA DISTRICT, FROM 1866
TO 1872: THAT IS, FROM HEINRICH NEUFELD’S
DEPARTURE TO THE FIRST GENERAL
CONFERENCE OF THE MENNONITE
BRETHREN CHURCH
1. Deacon Karl Benzien (freely adapted from Brother Heinrich
Epp’s “Reports” and the author’s personal recollections).
a) The Einlage Church still could not achieve that harmonious unity
for which all members yearned. The two factions, those of Neufeld and of
Unger, deriving from the aberrations of 1864-65, to which
newly -arriving members joined themselves according to inclination,
could not easily cooperate with each other. Br. Unger’s serious, some-
what formal but thoroughly sincere manner repelled many who
still recalled with pleasure the time of “great enthusiasm.” Even
brethren who displayed leadership qualities and felt called to a public
ministry, and who would have nothing of those times of excess, found
him to be too legalistic and too friendly towards the Baptists. A young
brother, Johann Siemens, later highly esteemed and very active in the
§199
460
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
church but long since departed, wove more than a tew thorns into
Unger’s crown during those years. “But the Lord does not lack
resources." He brought it to pass that in the spring of 1868 a brother
named Karl Benzien, deacon of the church of the Hamburg confession at
Dirschau in West Prussia, moved into the district of the Einlage Church
for business reasons, as an immigrant. At home he had been an
industrialist; here he was a farm manager. He was a cordial, gifted, and
rather well-educated Christian who was well acquainted with what was a
worthy and useful (Christian) church order.
b) A church business meeting was scheduled in Einlage for July 10,
1868, at which meeting Br. Benzien was appointed chairman. The
following resolutions were passed: 1) that the church bear the name
"Einlage Church”; 2) that the church establish “stations,” 250 besides
Einlage, Markusland (the brotherhood settlement named after the
former owner, now called Andreasfeld?) and Tschomoglas, etc.; 3) “the
members of our church who will serve the congregation are named:
elders, teachers, and deacons, which the church itself is to elect. The
elder of the chur
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…